Vertebrate Pest Conference : bibliography and index to the proceedings, 1st-16th (1962-94)

66 Pages·1995·2.6 MB·English

by  Paulik, Laurie A

Historic, Archive Document
Do not assume content reflects current
scientific knowledge, policies, or practices.

United States Vertebrate Pest
Departmentof
Agriculture
Animal and Conference
Plant Health
Inspection
Service
Bibliography and Index to the
Bibliographiesand
Literature of
Agriculture No. 129 Proceedings, 1 st-1 6th (1962-94)
.
Coverphoto: Thiswild-caughtcoyotewas a research
subject atthe DenverWildlife Research Centerfacility in
Logan, UT. APHIS photo byGuy E. Connolly.
The U.S. Department ofAgriculture (USDA) prohibitsdiscrimination in its programson the
basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, and marital or
familial status. (Not all prohibited bases applyto all programs.) Personswith disabilities who
require alternative meansforcommunication ofprogram information (braille, largeprint,
audiotape, etc.) should contactthe USDAOffice of Communications at [phone]
Tofile a complaint, write the Secretary ofAgriculture, U.S. Department ofAgriculture,
Washington, DC 20250, orcall [phone] (voice) or [phone] (TDD). USDAisan
equal employment opportunityemployer.
Issued October 1995
United States Vertebrate Pest
Departmentof
Agriculture
Animal and Conference
Plant Health
Inspection
Service
Bibliography and Index to the
Bibliographies and
Literature of
Agriculture No. 129 Proceedings, 1 st-1 6th (1962-94)
By Laurie A. Paulik1
1LaurieA. Paulikis a Librarian (Biological Sciences) atthe DenverWildlife Research Center,
a unit oftheAnimal Damage Control division ofthe U.S. Department ofAgriculture'sAnimal
and Plant Health Inspection Service.

Introduction
"Vertebrate Pest Conference: Bibliography and Indexto were indexed by scientific name unlessthe common
the Proceedings 1st—16th (1962-94)" is intended to aid name provides more direct access (e.g., jackals). All
researchers, field personnel, students, and all others taxonomic names follow"Mammal Species ofthe World:
interested in the vertebrate pest managementfield. ATaxonomic and Geographic Reference" (Smithsonian
Entries in the bibliography have unique record numbers Institution Press 1993) except where currentcommon
and are arranged alphabetically byfirstauthor. The usage dictates otherwise. Endangered species were
subject indexfollowsthe bibliography and uses key- indexed undertheirstandardized names as listed in the
words to group papers by topic. An author index, "Official World Wildlife Fund Guideto Endangered
located atthe back ofthe publication, lists all authors of Species of North America" (Beacham Publishing 1990).
each paper.
Names ofcountries otherthan the United States and
There are several importantfactors to note in using the names of islands were included in the index, but U.S.
index. Opening and closing remarks were not indexed; States generallywere not. The preponderance of
keynote addresses and otherworks ofa broad or articlesfrom certain States, especially California in the
philosophic nature orworks that could not be indexed early "Vertebrate Pest Conference Proceedings," would
understand-alone entries were placed underthe have rendered the inclusion of State names as index
heading "Wildlife Damage Management (general)" near items almost meaningless.
the end ofthe index. Papers giving a general overview
of vertebrate pests of a particularcountrywere indexed Most articles dealing with damage deal with control also.
undercountry name only. The term "control" was given preference in this index
and was used as a subheading undermany animal
Laboratory studies on a particular rodenticide were species. The term "damage" appears lessfrequently.
generally indexed underthe name ofthe rodenticide
only, notthe species of laboratory animals studied. In Editorial liberties were taken to standardize author
review orsurvey papersthatcoverall control techniques names and italicization ofspecies names throughoutthe
used in certain areas orforcertain species, onlythose 16 volumes of proceedings.
techniques covered in some depth were indexed.
However, some items mentioned briefly but of recurring
interest were also indexed.
Lack of standardization in use of mammal and bird
namesthroughoutthe 30 years covered bythe proceed-
ings caused numerous indexing difficulties. Thefollow-
ing conventions and exceptions will apply. Common bird
pest species of NorthAmerica were indexed bythe most
useful direct name. This name mayormay not differ
from the name as standardized in the "A.O.U. Check-list
of NorthAmerican Birds (6th ed.)" and updated in the
"Check-list of North American Birds" (TucsonAudubon
Society 1990). Thus, papers on coots arefound under
thatterm ratherthan "American coots," and articles on
starlings were indexed underthatterm ratherthan
European starlings. Birds referred to in papers by
genericterms such as "blackbirds" or"crows" were
indexed underthoseterms. Red-winged blackbirds were
indexed undertheterm "blackbirds." NorthAmerican
mammals (otherthan rodents) were indexed only by
theircommon names. Some rodent genera in which
there are multiple species of interest and forwhich there
are many papers were indexed bysubject undera
collective common name (e.g., ground squirrels) and by
species underthe Latin name. Worldwide commensal
rodent species (Norway rats, roof rats, house mice, etc.)
were indexed undertheircommon names. Bird and
mammal speciesfrom areas otherthan NorthAmerica
1
Acknowledgements
Many people in the U.S. Department ofAgriculture/
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service/Animal
Damage Control/DenverWildlife Research Center
(DWRC) contributed to this project. I would like to
acknowledge the efforts of LuanaA. Whitehead, of
DWRC's Gainesville, FL, field station, in compiling the
bibliography. Without her initial work in entering all the
conference papers into a special computerized format,
the project may never have gotten started. I'd liketo
thank Barbara Recktenwald of DWRC's program and
research support section for her recommendations,
guidance, and word processing expertise. Herabilities
were utilized extensively to plan and produce a cohe-
sive, readable work. The DWRC wildlife biologists who
listened to my ideas and provided suggestions and
direction in this effort deserve special thanks. Finally, I
gratefully acknowledge MikeAvery ofthe Gainesville
field station forworking with me to initiatethis project,
reviewing various drafts, suggesting improvements, and
coordinating publication ofthe index.
2
Conference Proceedings
1994. Proceedings: Sixteenth Vertebrate Pest Confer- 1974. Proceedings: Sixth Vertebrate Pest Conference
ence (Santa Clara, CA, March 1-3, 1994). (Anaheim, CA, March 5-7, 1974). Warren V.
Wendy S. Halverson andA. Charles Crabb, eds. Johnson, ed. Vertebrate Pest Committee,
Vertebrate Pest Council, University ofCalifornia, University ofCalifornia, Davis. 299 p.
Davis. 360 p.
1972. Proceedings: Fifth Vertebrate Pest Conference
1992. Proceedings: Fifteenth Vertebrate PestConfer- (Fresno, CA, March 7-9, 1972). Rex E. Marsh,
ence (Newport Beach, CA, March 3-5, 1992). ed. California Vertebrate Pest Committee,
John E. Borreco and Rex E. Marsh, eds. Verte- University of California, Davis. 203 p.
brate Pest Council, University ofCalifornia,
Davis. 415 p. 1970. Proceedings: Fourth Vertebrate Pest Conference
(West Sacramento, CA, March 3-5, 1970).
1990. Proceedings: Fourteenth Vertebrate Pest Richard H. Dana, ed. California Vertebrate Pest
Conference (Sacramento, CA, March 6-8, 1990). Committee, University of California, Davis. 204 p.
Lewis R. Davis and Rex E. Marsh, eds. Verte-
brate Pest Council, University of California, 1967. Proceedings: Third Vertebrate Pest Conference
Davis. 371 p. (San Francisco, CA, March 7-9, 1967). California
Vertebrate PestTechnical Committee, University
1988. Proceedings: Thirteenth Vertebrate PestConfer- of California, Davis. 178 p.
ence (Monterey, CA, March 1-3, 1988). A. Charles
Crabb and Rex E. Marsh, eds. Vertebrate Pest 1964. Second Vertebrate Pest Control Conference
Council, University ofCalifornia, Davis. 326 p. (Anaheim, CA, March 4-5, 1964). California
Vertebrate Pest Control Technical Committee,
1986. Proceedings: Twelfth Vertebrate Pest Conference Universityof California, Davis. 160 p.
(San Diego, CA, March 4-6, 1986). Terrell P.
Salmon, ed. Vertebrate Pest Council, University 1962. Proceedings: Vertebrate Pest Control Conference
ofCalifornia, Davis. 395 p. (Sacramento, CA, February 6-7, 1962). National
PestControlAssociation, Elizabeth, NJ. 391 p.
1984. Proceedings: Eleventh Vertebrate Pest Confer-
ence (Sacramento, CA, March 6-8, 1984). Dell
O. Clark, ed. Vertebrate Pest Council, University
ofCalifornia, Davis. 238 p.
1982. Proceedings: Tenth Vertebrate Pest Conference
(Monterey, CA, February 23-25, 1982). Rex E.
Marsh, ed. Vertebrate Pest Council, University of
California, Davis. 245 p.
1980. Proceedings: Ninth Vertebrate Pest Conference
(Fresno, CA, March 4-6, 1980). Jerry P. Clark,
ed. Vertebrate Pest Council, University of
California, Davis. 235 p.
1978. Proceedings: Eighth Vertebrate Pest Conference
(Sacramento, CA, March 7-9, 1978). Walter E.
Howard, ed. Vertebrate Pest Council, University
ofCalifornia, Davis. 269 p.
1976. Proceedings: Seventh Vertebrate Pest Confer-
ence (Monterey, CA, March 9-11, 1976). Charles
C. Siebe, ed. Vertebrate Pest Council, University
ofCalifornia, Davis. 323 p.
3
.
Bibliography
Vertebrate Pest Conference Proceedings
1000. Acord, B. R. 1992. Responses of theADC 1120. Alsager, D. E. 1976. The role of private
ProgramtoachangingAmericansociety. 15:9-11 consultants in vertebrate pest problems in
Canada. 7:26-34.
1005. Acord, B. R.; Ramey, C. A.; Werge, R. W. 1994.
Charting a future: process and promise. 16:5-8. 1130. Al-Sanei, K. S.; Zaghloul, T. M.; Salit, A. M.;
Omar, M. T; Balba, M. M. 1984. Success in rat
1010. Acorn, R. C; Dorrance, M. J. 1994. An evaluation control in Kuwait. 11:77-81.
of anti-coyote electric fences. 16:45-50.
1140. Amling, W. 1980. Exclusion of gullsfrom
1015. Advani, R. 1986. Field evaluation of single and reservoirs in Orange County, California. 9:29-30.
multiple dose anticoagulant rodenticides in
reducing rodent populations and damages in 1150. Anthony, R. M.; Barnes, V. G., Jr.; Evans, J.
coconut plantations. 12:166-172. 1978. 'Vexar'®plastic netting to reduce pocket
gopherdepredation of conifer seedlings.
1020. Advani, R. 1992. Field evaluation ofthree 8:138-144.
anticoagulant rodenticides against Mus musculus
populations in apartmental buildings in NewYork 1160. Anthony, R. M.; Evans, J.; Lindsey, G. D. 1986.
City. 15:208-211. Strychnine-salt blocks forcontrolling porcupines
in pine forest: efficacy and hazards. 12:191-195.
1030. Advani, R.; Prakash, I.; Mathur, R. P. 1988.
Reduction in rodent populations through 1170. Anthony, R. M.; Lindsey, G. D.; Evans, J. 1984.
intermittent control operations in the cropping Hazards to golden-mantled ground squirrels and
ecosystem ofthe Indian Desert. 13:119-122. associated secondary hazard potential from
strychnine baiting forforest pocket gophers.
1040. Akande, M. 1978. Some problems concerning the 11:25-31.
control of bird damage in south-western Nigeria.
8:224-225. 1180. Areson, C. W. 1986. Pest bird control with the
avicide BCF 7000—Sun Oil Refinery Project,
1050. Akande, M. 1982. The red-eyed turtle dove Tulsa, Oklahoma. 12:307-311.
(Streptopelia semitorquata)as an agricultural
pest in Nigeria. 10:104-106. 1190. Areson, C. W. 1988. Photographic records—their
importance in today's environmentally sensitive
1060. Akande, M. 1986. The economic importance and bird management programs. 13:245-247.
control of vertebrate pests of graminaceous
crops with particular reference to rice (Oryza 1195. Armistead, A. R.; Mitchell, K.; Connolly, G. E.
—
sativa)\n Nigeria a review. 12:303-306. 1994. Bear relocations to avoid bear/sheep
conflicts. 16:31-35.
1070. Akande, M.; Obajimi, A. O. 1990. The effect of
seed coat colourand depth of planting on 1200. Arnstein, P. 1962. Infectious disease hazards to
bushfowl damage to planted maize seeds. pest control operators. 1:308-326.
14:325-326.
1210. Askham, L. R. 1986. Anticoagulanttranslocation
1080. Aldrich, D. G., Jr. 1962. People, pests and some and plant residue studies in crops. 12:133-139.
plans (banquet speech). 1:213-226.
1220. Askham, L. R. 1988. Atwo year study ofthe
1090. Ali, A. M. 1978. The changing rodent pest fauna physical and economic impact ofvoles (Microtus
in Egypt. 8:28-31. montanus)on mixed maturity apple (Malusspp.)
orchards in the pacific northwestern United
1100. Ali, A. M.; Hafez, H. A. 1976. Wildlife and States. 13:151-155.
vertebrate pests in Egypt. 7:276-278.
1230. Askham, L. R. 1990. Effect of artificial perches
1110. Alsager, D. E. 1972. Experimental population and nests in attracting raptors to orchards.
suppression of Richardson's ground squirrels 14:144-148.
(Spermophilus richardsonii) in Alberta. 5:93-100.
4