Texas instruments, Op Amps For Everyone Chapter 1-9

160 Pages·2001·0.74 MB·English

by  Texas Instruments, Incorporated

(cid:7)(cid:19) (cid:2)(cid:16)(cid:19)(cid:21) (cid:5)(cid:18)(cid:20) (cid:4)(cid:23)(cid:12)(cid:20)(cid:24)(cid:18)(cid:17)(cid:12)
(cid:8)(cid:18)(cid:17) (cid:6)(cid:9)(cid:17)(cid:10)(cid:15)(cid:17)(cid:15)(cid:1)
(cid:4)(cid:11)(cid:15)(cid:22)(cid:18)(cid:20) (cid:15)(cid:17) (cid:3)(cid:14)(cid:15)(cid:12)(cid:13)
Design
Reference
September 2001 Advanced Analog Products
SLOD006A
IMPORTANT NOTICE
Texas Instruments Incorporated and its subsidiaries (TI) reserve the right to make corrections,
modifications, enhancements, improvements, and other changes to its products and services at
any time and to discontinue any product or service without notice. Customers should obtain the
latest relevant information before placing orders and should verify that such information is current
and complete. All products are sold subject to TI’s terms and conditions of sale supplied at the
time of order acknowledgment.
TI warrants performance of its hardware products to the specifications applicable at the time of
sale in accordance with TI’s standard warranty. Testing and other quality control techniques are
used to the extent TI deems necessary to support this warranty. Except where mandated by
government requirements, testing of all parameters of each product is not necessarily performed.
TI assumes no liability for applications assistance or customer product design. Customers are
responsible for their products and applications using TI components. To minimize the risks
associated with customer products and applications, customers should provide adequate design
and operating safeguards.
TI does not warrant or represent that any license, either express or implied, is granted under any
TI patent right, copyright, mask work right, or other TI intellectual property right relating to any
combination, machine, or process in which TI products or services are used. Information
published by TI regarding third party products or services does not constitute a license from TI
to use such products or services or a warranty or endorsement thereof. Use of such information
may require a license from a third party under the patents or other intellectual property of that third
party, or a license from TI under the patents or other intellectual property of TI.
Reproduction of information in TI data books or data sheets is permissible only if reproduction
is without alteration and is accompanied by all associated warranties, conditions, limitations, and
notices. Reproduction of this information with alteration is an unfair and deceptive business
practice. TI is not responsible or liable for such altered documentation.
Resale of TI products or services with statements different from or beyond the parameters stated
by TI for that product or service voids all express and any implied warranties for the associated
TI product or service and is an unfair and deceptive business practice. TI is not responsible or
liable for any such statements.
Mailing Address:
Texas Instruments
Post Office Box 655303
Dallas, Texas 75265
Copyright  2001, Texas Instruments Incorporated
Chapter 1
The Op Amp’s Place In The World
Ron Mancini
In 1934 Harry Black[1] commuted from his home in New York City to work at Bell Labs
in New Jersey by way of a railroad/ferry. The ferry ride relaxed Harry enabling him to do
some conceptual thinking. Harry had a tough problem to solve; when phone lines were
extended long distances, they needed amplifiers, and undependable amplifiers limited
phone service. First, initial tolerances on the gain were poor, but that problem was quickly
solved with an adjustment. Second, even when an amplifier was adjusted correctly at the
factory, the gain drifted so much during field operation that the volume was too low or the
incoming speech was distorted.
Many attempts had been made to make a stable amplifier, but temperature changes and
power supply voltage extremes experienced on phone lines caused uncontrollable gain
drift. Passive components had much better drift characteristics than active components
had, thus if an amplifier’s gain could be made dependent on passive components, the
problem would be solved. During one of his ferry trips, Harry’s fertile brain conceived a
novel solution for the amplifier problem, and he documented the solution while riding on
the ferry.
The solution was to first build an amplifier that had more gain than the application re-
quired. Then some of the amplifier output signal was fed back to the input in a manner
that makes the circuit gain (circuit is the amplifier and feedback components) dependent
on the feedback circuit rather than the amplifier gain. Now the circuit gain is
dependent on the passive feedback components rather than the active amplifier. This is
called negative feedback, and it is the underlying operating principle for all modern day
op amps. Harry had documented the first intentional feedback circuit during a ferry ride.
I am sure unintentional feedback circuits had been built prior to that time, but the design-
ers ignored the effect!
I can hear the squeals of anguish coming from the managers and amplifier designers. I
imagine that they said something like this, “it is hard enough to achieve 30-kHz gain–
bandwidth (GBW), and now this fool wants me to design an amplifier with 3-MHz GBW.
But, he is still going to get a circuit gain GBW of 30 kHz”. Well, time has proven Harry right,
but there is a minor problem that Harry didn’t discuss in detail, and that is the oscillation
1-1
problem. It seems that circuits designed with large open loop gains sometimes oscillate
when the loop is closed. A lot of people investigated the instability effect, and it was pretty
well understood in the 1940s, but solving stability problems involved long, tedious, and
intricate calculations. Years passed without anybody making the problem solution simpler
or more understandable.
In 1945 H. W. Bode presented a system for analyzing the stability of feedback systems
by using graphical methods. Until this time, feedback analysis was done by multiplication
and division, so calculation of transfer functions was a time consuming and laborious task.
Remember, engineers did not have calculators or computers until the ’70s. Bode present-
ed a log technique that transformed the intensely mathematical process of calculating a
feedback system’s stability into graphical analysis that was simple and perceptive. Feed-
back system design was still complicated, but it no longer was an art dominated by a few
electrical engineers kept in a small dark room. Any electrical engineer could use Bode’s
methods to find the stability of a feedback circuit, so the application of feedback to ma-
chines began to grow. There really wasn’t much call for electronic feedback design until
computers and transducers become of age.
The first real-time computer was the analog computer! This computer used prepro-
grammed equations and input data to calculate control actions. The programming was
hard wired with a series of circuits that performed math operations on the data, and the
hard wiring limitation eventually caused the declining popularity of the analog computer.
The heart of the analog computer was a device called an operational amplifier because
it could be configured to perform many mathematical operations such as multiplication,
addition, subtraction, division, integration, and differentiation on the input signals. The
name was shortened to the familiar op amp, as we have come to know and love them.
The op amp used an amplifier with a large open loop gain, and when the loop was closed,
the amplifier performed the mathematical operations dictated by the external passive
components. This amplifier was very large because it was built with vacuum tubes and
it required a high-voltage power supply, but it was the heart of the analog computer, thus
its large size and huge power requirements were accepted as the price of doing business.
Many early op amps were designed for analog computers, and it was soon found out that
op amps had other uses and were very handy to have around the physics lab.
At this time general-purpose analog computers were found in universities and large com-
pany laboratories because they were critical to the research work done there. There was
a parallel requirement for transducer signal conditioning in lab experiments, and op amps
found their way into signal conditioning applications. As the signal conditioning applica-
tions expanded, the demand for op amps grew beyond the analog computer require-
ments, and even when the analog computers lost favor to digital computers, the op amp
survived because of its importance in universal analog applications. Eventually digital
computers replaced the analog computers (a sad day for real-time measurements), but
the demand for op amps increased as measurement applications increased.
1-2
The first signal conditioning op amps were constructed with vacuum tubes prior to the
introduction of transistors, so they were large and bulky. During the ’50s, miniature vacu-
um tubes that worked from lower voltage power supplies enabled the manufacture of op
amps that shrunk to the size of a brick used in house construction, so the op amp modules
were nicknamed bricks. Vacuum tube size and component size decreased until an op
amp was shrunk to the size of a single octal vacuum tube. Transistors were commercially
developed in the ’60s, and they further reduced op amp size to several cubic inches, but
the nickname brick still held on. Now the nickname brick is attached to any electronic mod-
ule that uses potting compound or non-integrated circuit (IC) packaging methods. Most
of these early op amps were made for specific applications, so they were not necessarily
general purpose. The early op amps served a specific purpose, but each manufacturer
had different specifications and packages; hence, there was little second sourcing among
the early op amps.
ICs were developed during the late 1950s and early 1960s, but it wasn’t till the middle
1960s that Fairchild released the µA709. This was the first commercially successful IC
op amp, and Robert J. Widler designed it. The µA709 had its share of problems, but any
competent analog engineer could use it, and it served in many different analog applica-
tions. The major drawback of the µA709 was stability; it required external compensation
and a competent analog engineer to apply it. Also, the µA709 was quite sensitive because
it had a habit of self destructing under any adverse condition. The self-destruction habit
was so prevalent that one major military equipment manufacturer published a paper titled
something like, The 12 Pearl Harbor Conditions of the µA709. The µA741 followed the
µA709, and it is an internally compensated op amp that does not require external com-
pensation if operated under data sheet conditions. Also, it is much more forgiving than
the µA709. There has been a never-ending series of new op amps released each year
since then, and their performance and reliability has improved to the point where present
day op amps can be used for analog applications by anybody.
The IC op amp is here to stay; the latest generation op amps cover the frequency spec-
trum from 5-kHz GBW to beyond 1-GHz GBW. The supply voltage ranges from guaran-
teed operation at 0.9 V to absolute maximum voltage ratings of 1000 V. The input current
and input offset voltage has fallen so low that customers have problems verifying the
specifications during incoming inspection. The op amp has truly become the universal
analog IC because it performs all analog tasks. It can function as a line driver, comparator
(one bit A/D), amplifier, level shifter, oscillator, filter, signal conditioner, actuator driver, cur-
rent source, voltage source, and many other applications. The designer’s problem is how
to rapidly select the correct circuit/op amp combination and then, how to calculate the pas-
sive component values that yield the desired transfer function in the circuit.
This book deals with op amp circuits — not with the innards of op amps. It treats the cal-
culations from the circuit level, and it doesn’t get bogged down in a myriad of detailed cal-
culations. Rather, the reader can start at the level appropriate for them, and quickly move
on to the advanced topics. If you are looking for material about the innards of op amps
1-3
you are looking in the wrong place. The op amp is treated as a completed component in
this book.
The op amp will continue to be a vital component of analog design because it is such a
fundamental component. Each generation of electronics equipment integrates more
functions on silicon and takes more of the analog circuitry inside the IC. Don’t fear, as digi-
tal applications increase, analog applications also increase because the predominant
supply of data and interface applications are in the real world, and the real world is an ana-
log world. Thus, each new generation of electronics equipment creates requirements for
new analog circuits; hence, new generations of op amps are required to fulfill these re-
quirements. Analog design, and op amp design, is a fundamental skill that will be required
far into the future.
References
1 Black, H. S., Stabilized Feedback Amplifiers, BSTJ, Vol. 13, January 1934
1-4
Chapter 2
Review of Circuit Theory
Ron Mancini
2.1 Introduction
Although this book minimizes math, some algebra is germane to the understanding of
analog electronics. Math and physics are presented here in the manner in which they are
used later, so no practice exercises are given. For example, after the voltage divider rule
is explained, it is used several times in the development of other concepts, and this usage
constitutes practice.
Circuits are a mix of passive and active components. The components are arranged in
a manner that enables them to perform some desired function. The resulting arrangement
of components is called a circuit or sometimes a circuit configuration. The art portion of
analog design is developing the circuit configuration. There are many published circuit
configurations for almost any circuit task, thus all circuit designers need not be artists.
When the design has progressed to the point that a circuit exists, equations must be writ-
ten to predict and analyze circuit performance. Textbooks are filled with rigorous methods
for equation writing, and this review of circuit theory does not supplant those textbooks.
But, a few equations are used so often that they should be memorized, and these equa-
tions are considered here.
There are almost as many ways to analyze a circuit as there are electronic engineers, and
if the equations are written correctly, all methods yield the same answer. There are some
simple ways to analyze the circuit without completing unnecessary calculations, and
these methods are illustrated here.
2.2 Laws of Physics
Ohm’s law is stated as V=IR, and it is fundamental to all electronics. Ohm’s law can be
applied to a single component, to any group of components, or to a complete circuit. When
the current flowing through any portion of a circuit is known, the voltage dropped across
that portion of the circuit is obtained by multiplying the current times the resistance (Equa-
tion 2–1).
2-1
Laws of Physics
V (cid:1) IR (2–1)
In Figure 2–1, Ohm’s law is applied to the total circuit. The current, (I) flows through the
total resistance (R), and the voltage (V) is dropped across R.
I
V R
Figure 2–1. Ohm’s Law Applied to the Total Circuit
In Figure 2–2, Ohm’s law is applied to a single component. The current (I ) flows through
R
the resistor (R) and the voltage (V ) is dropped across R. Notice, the same formula is used
R
to calculate the voltage drop across R even though it is only a part of the circuit.
IR
V R VR
Figure 2–2. Ohm’s Law Applied to a Component
Kirchoff’s voltage law states that the sum of the voltage drops in a series circuit equals
the sum of the voltage sources. Otherwise, the source (or sources) voltage must be
dropped across the passive components. When taking sums keep in mind that the sum
is an algebraic quantity. Kirchoff’s voltage law is illustrated in Figure 2–3 and Equations
2–2 and 2–3.
R1
VR1
V R2 VR2
Figure 2–3. Kirchoff’s Voltage Law
(cid:2) (cid:2)
V (cid:1) V (2–2)
SOURCES DROPS
V (cid:1) V (cid:0)V (2–3)
R1 R2
Kirchoff’s current law states: the sum of the currents entering a junction equals the sum
of the currents leaving a junction. It makes no difference if a current flows from a current
2-2
Voltage Divider Rule
source, through a component, or through a wire, because all currents are treated identi-
cally. Kirchoff’s current law is illustrated in Figure 2–4 and Equations 2–4 and 2–5.
I4 I3
I1 I2
Figure 2–4. Kirchoff’s Current Law
(cid:2) (cid:2)
I (cid:1) I (2–4)
IN OUT
I (cid:0)I (cid:1) I (cid:0)I (2–5)
1 2 3 4
2.3 Voltage Divider Rule
When the output of a circuit is not loaded, the voltage divider rule can be used to calculate
the circuit’s output voltage. Assume that the same current flows through all circuit ele-
ments (Figure 2–5). Equation 2–6 is written using Ohm’s law as V = I (R + R ). Equation
1 2
2–7 is written as Ohm’s law across the output resistor.
R1
I
I
V R2 VO
Figure 2–5. Voltage Divider Rule
V
I (cid:1) (2–6)
R (cid:0)R
1 2
V (cid:1) IR (2–7)
OUT 2
Substituting Equation 2–6 into Equation 2–7, and using algebraic manipulation yields
Equation 2–8.
R
V (cid:1) V 2 (2–8)
OUT R (cid:0)R
1 2
A simple way to remember the voltage divider rule is that the output resistor is divided by
the total circuit resistance. This fraction is multiplied by the input voltage to obtain the out-
Review of Circuit Theory 2-3
Current Divider Rule
put voltage. Remember that the voltage divider rule always assumes that the output resis-
tor is not loaded; the equation is not valid when the output resistor is loaded by a parallel
component. Fortunately, most circuits following a voltage divider are input circuits, and
input circuits are usually high resistance circuits. When a fixed load is in parallel with the
output resistor, the equivalent parallel value comprised of the output resistor and loading
resistor can be used in the voltage divider calculations with no error. Many people ignore
the load resistor if it is ten times greater than the output resistor value, but this calculation
can lead to a 10% error.
2.4 Current Divider Rule
When the output of a circuit is not loaded, the current divider rule can be used to calculate
the current flow in the output branch circuit (R ). The currents I and I in Figure 2–6 are
2 1 2
assumed to be flowing in the branch circuits. Equation 2–9 is written with the aid of Kirch-
off’s current law. The circuit voltage is written in Equation 2–10 with the aid of Ohm’s law.
Combining Equations 2–9 and 2–10 yields Equation 2–11.
I1 I2
I R1 R2 V
Figure 2–6. Current Divider Rule
I (cid:1) I1(cid:0)I2 (2–9)
V (cid:1) I1R1(cid:1) I2R2 (2–10)
I (cid:1) I1(cid:0)I2 (cid:1) I2RR2(cid:0)I2 (cid:1) I2(cid:2)R1R(cid:0)R2(cid:3) (2–11)
1 1
Rearranging the terms in Equation 2–11 yields Equation 2–12.
(cid:2) R (cid:3)
I2(cid:1) I R1(cid:0)1R2 (2–12)
The total circuit current divides into two parts, and the resistance (R ) divided by the total
1
resistance determines how much current flows through R . An easy method of remember-
2
ing the current divider rule is to remember the voltage divider rule. Then modify the voltage
divider rule such that the opposite resistor is divided by the total resistance, and the frac-
tion is multiplied by the input current to get the branch current.
2-4