RONLER ACRES CONTRACTOR EHS PROGRAM

204 Pages·2006·0.84 MB·English

RROONNLLEERR AACCRREESS
CCOONNTTRRAACCTTOORR EEHHSS PPRROOGGRRAAMM
RREEQQUUIIRREEMMEENNTTSS

Complete Document Revision – Rev 2
Date Complete Document Last Revised – 11/29/01
Date of Last Update – 03/30/04
Document Owner – Intel Projects EHS

The following EHS program requirements were developed jointly by
the Ronler Acres Site EHS organization and the Ronler Acres Projects
EHS organization in an effort to standardize EHS construction
procedures occurring on the Ronler Acres campus. These program
requirements shall be implemented by all contractors/subcontractors
operating on the Ronler Acres Campus irrespective if they are
performing under a CS or construction project authorized contract.
Changes to these program requirements will be controlled through the
Ronler Acres Management Alignment Committee.
Blank Page
RROONNLLEERR AACCRREESS CCOONNTTRRAACCTTOORR EEHHSS PPRROOGGRRAAMM
RREEQQUUIIRREEMMEENNTTSS
TTAABBLLEE OOFF CCOONNTTEENNTTSS
(Click on link to go to BKM)

Title
Air Pollution Control Plan
Barricading and Safety Signage
CC/CM Incentive Administration
Chemical Approval Program
Confined Space Entry
Construction Incident Response
Control of Hazardous Energy (Lo/To)
Co-Occupancy Management
Cooling Tower Entry
Cranes, Rigging, and Hoists
Hoist Planning Worksheet
Cryogen Dewar Elevator Transportation
EHS Program Improvement and Escalation
Electrical Demolition
Electrical Panel Penetration
Energized Electrical Work (EEW)
Equipment Sign-Off (ESO)
Ergonomics
Fall Protection
Sub Fab Fall Protection - Alternatives
Forklifts
Forklift Daily Inspection Form
Hand Protection
Hazard Communication
Hazard Material Control Plan/Waste Minimization and Pollution
Prevention
Hearing Conservation
Housekeeping
Hydrostatic and Static Testing
Injury Free Environment
RA Contractor BKMs Rev. 2 11/29/01
Owner: OR/WA/UT Projects EHS
Ladders
Liquid Management
Notice: Containment In Progress (Signage)
Mobile Elevated Work Platforms (MEWP)
MEWP Initial and Daily Checklists
Non-Electrical Hot Work (NEHW)
Odor Notification
Operational Readiness Management
Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)
Powder Actuated Tools
Powered Work Vehicles (Golf Carts)
Pre-Safety Level 1 Electrical Distribution Panel Connection Procedure
Public/Community Relations
Raised Floor: Fab
Raised Floor: Non-Fab
Pre-Entry Checklist and Stop Sign
Respiratory Protection
Revocation and Reinstatement of Access Privileges
Safety Incident Investigation/Reporting
Safety Self Assessment (SSA)
Scaffolds
Solid Waste Management Plan
Spill Prevention and Control Plan
Subcontractor Pre-Qualification
Substance Abuse Management
Sub Fab Catwalk Access
Temporary Structures (E.G. Enclosures)
Tools/Equipment
Tool Install/Clean Room Safety
Tool Move
Trenching and Excavation
Waste Water and Storm Water Management
RA Contractor BKMs Rev. 2 11/29/01
Owner: OR/WA/UT Projects EHS
RONLER ACRES CONTRACTOR EHS PROGRAM

BKM Rev10/97
AIR POLLUTION CONTROL PLAN
1. OBJECTIVE
1.1. To define the Ronler Acres expectations of contractors regarding the
Air Pollution Control Plan.

2. PROCEDURES/EXPECTATIONS
2.1. Each Contractor company is responsible for the design and
implementation of an Air Pollution Control Plan to prevent/minimize the
release of fugitive emissions of air pollutants and nuisance conditions.
The program must meet or exceed all applicable federal, state and
local regulations and standards. The applicable state regulations are
Oregon Administrative Rules (OAR) 340-21-050 through 340-21-060
and in OAR 340-30-440 and in OAR 340-30-043.

2.2. Specific program requirements are provided in the CS Construction
Manual, Air Pollution Control Plan section.

2.3. Fugitive emissions include the presence in the ambient air of dust,
fumes, gases, mist, odorous matter, vapors or smoke. Nuisance
conditions are defined as unusual or annoying amounts of fugitive
emissions having characteristics and duration as to exceed or
contribute to exceeding government laws, regulations and standards.
Contractors are prohibited from conducting open burning on the Ronler
Acres Campus.

2.4. The Contractor is responsible for determining when and where Air
Pollution Control measures are required to prevent/reduce fugitive
emissions that are generated as a result of Contractor activities on
either new construction or sustaining contractor projects.

2.5. The Contractor is responsible for providing all training and equipment

required for the Air Pollution Control Plan.

2.6. The Air Pollution Control Plan shall be documented and available for
Intel review.

RA Contractor BKMs Rev. 2 11/29/01
Owner: OR/WA/UT Projects EHS
Blank Page
RA Contractor BKMs Rev. 2 11/29/01
Owner: OR/WA/UT Projects EHS
RONLER ACRES CONTRACTOR EHS PROGRAM
BKM Rev 2 03/03
BARRICADING AND SAFETY SIGNAGE
1. OBJECTIVE
1.1. To define the Ronler Acres expectations of contractors when using
barricades and barricading signage.

2. PROCEDURES/EXPECTATIONS

2.1. Barricading Procedures

2.1.1. The contractor shall provide all necessary barricades, safety
signs, safety cones, or safety tape as required to isolate or
protect an unsafe work area from other workers, pedestrian or
vehicle traffic.

2.1.2. Barricades should completely enclose the hazardous area.

2.1.3. Barricades must be maintained in good condition. Barricade
tape shall not be used on the floor as this presents a slipping
hazard of its own.

2.1.4. In addition to using the proper warning tape, the contractor shall
use the appropriate safety signage when barricading an area.
All information on the signage must be filled out completely.

2.1.5. Required Sign Usage:

2.1.5.1. For all raised floor areas, the attached STOP sign with
the Raised Floor Pre-Entry Checklist shall be used.

2.1.5.2. For non-raised floor areas, the attached yellow
CAUTION sign shall be used when using yellow
CAUTION tape.

2.1.5.3. For non-raised floor areas, the attached red DANGER
sign shall be used when using red DANGER tape.

2.1.6. All barricading /signage shall be removed after work is complete
and hazard is eliminated.

2.1.7. Barricading by hazard category:
RA Contractor BKMs Rev. 2 11/29/01
Owner: OR/WA/UT Projects EHS
Color of Tape Hazard Action Example
Classification
Yellow Occupational Hazard Do not cross until Overhead work
hazard is identified and
safe passage/access is Trip hazard
assured.

Use to identify the
presence of a possible
hazard
Red High/Imminent Danger Never cross. Energized Electrical
Work
Fatality Prevention If access is required,
coordinate with contact Overhead suspended
person identified on load
barricade signage
Critical high pressure
test

Chemical introduction

Fall exposure
Red/Yellow ERT (Emergency Never Cross ERT response areas
Response Zone) ONLY
If access is required,
coordinate with the ERT
leader
RA Contractor BKMs Rev. 2 11/29/01
Owner: OR/WA/UT Projects EHS
RONLER ACRES CONTRACTOR EHS PROGRAM

BKM Rev 11/97
CC/CM INCENTIVE ADMINISTRATION
1. PURPOSE
1.1. The purpose of an EHS incentive should be to motivate involved
parties to embrace new challenges, continuously improve and
introducing proven methods of doing business that will help in creating
an Injury and Incident Free work environment. It has been found to be
effective to view incentives as a process rather than a defined
expectation with a final evaluation.

2. PROGRAM ELEMENTS

2.1. Incentive Decision Process (CM/GC) – At the commencement of each
project, the evaluation to use incentives as a performance
improvement tool should be conducted. Several key elements should
be evaluated when making this decision:

2.1.1. Current EHS Program (Written and Executed) - Should include
all five of the CII high impact EHS management techniques
2.1.2. Past Performance History
2.1.3. Experience with Intel
2.1.4. Experience with Local Labor Force
2.1.5. Willingness to Modify Current Program Elements
2.1.6. Demonstrated Ability to Modify Project Behavior

2.2. CM/GC Incentive – If it is decided to implement an incentive program
(inclusive of EHS), the current INTEL PROJECTS EHS BKM incentive
is generally broken into two pieces:

2.2.1. Lagging performance measures – may include injury rates,
incident rates, SIPP incident histories, environmental audit
performance or a combination of one or more of these
elements. These are considered lagging indicators because
they reflect past performance.

2.2.2. Leading Indicator/Continuous Improvement – portion of the
incentive designed to have a proactive EHS management focus,
generally measured quarterly. This incentive should be
developed to ensure prevention through proactive program
development and continuous improvement.

RA Contractor BKMs Rev. 2 11/29/01
Owner: OR/WA/UT Projects EHS
2.3. The EHS incentive should occupy a significant portion of the overall
incentive value, with typical ranges of 30-60% of total allocation. It is
recommended that CM/GC incentives include an at-risk value equal to
the incentive value.

2.4. Roles And Responsibilities:

2.4.1. Intel Project Manager – Responsible to work with Intel Projects
EHS representative to assess current CM/GC capabilities and
assess incentive programs potential effectiveness in driving
improvement.

2.4.2. Intel Projects EHS Representative – Shall work with Project
Manager to communicate current CM/GC capabilities, to
communicate incentive BKM's and to propose various incentive
strategies.
RA Contractor BKMs Rev. 2 11/29/01
Owner: OR/WA/UT Projects EHS