NITROGEN AND PHOSPHORUS RESORPTION IN SOME SYMPATRIC PLANT SPECIES IN THE

13 Pages·2016·0.65 MB·English

Revue d’Ecologie (Terre et Vie), Vol. 72 (1), 2017 : 48-60
NITROGEN AND PHOSPHORUS RESORPTION IN SOME SYMPATRIC PLANT SPECIES
IN THE NORTH OF TURKEY
Cengiz YILDIRIM1, Hamdi Güray KUTBAY2, Arzu CANSARAN1, Hakan YILMAZ3
& Dudu Duygu KILIÇ1*
1Amasya University, Faculty of Education, Department of Biology, 05100, Amasya, Turkey
2University of Ondokuz Mayıs, Faculty of Science & Arts, Department of Biology, Samsun, Turkey
3University of Ordu, Faculty of Science & Arts, Department of Biology, Ordu, Turkey
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]

RÉSUMÉ.— Résorption de l’azote et du phosphore chez quelques espèces végétales dans le nord de la
Turquie.— Les concentrations foliaires de nutriments (N et P) en été et en automne, ainsi que l’efficience (RE) et
la proficience (RP) de la résorption foliaire, ont été étudiées dans le nord de la Turquie chez quelques espèces
végétales décidues sympatriques sur sols à faible teneur en phosphore. Les NRE et PRE trouvées sur les espèces
étudiées se situaient dans les éventails de valeurs rapportés par d’autres études. Les concentrations en N et P les
plus fortes, rapportées tant à la masse qu’à la surface, ont été observées chez Acer hyrcanum subsp.
sphaerocaryum. Les plus fortes NRE ont également été trouvées chez Acer hyrcanum subsp. sphaerocaryum alors
que les plus grandes PRE ont été décelées chez Sorbus umbellata var. umbellata. Toutefois la tendance inverse est
apparue quand, pour ces deux espèces, la correction MLCF a été appliquée. L’espèce la plus N- et P-proficiente
était Cerasus mahaleb en raison des plus faibles concentrations en N et P trouvées dans les feuilles sénescentes.
Cependant, l’espèce la plus N-proficiente était S. umbellata var. umbellate pour ce qui concerne la NRP basée sur
la masse. Les rapports N/P des feuilles vertes des espèces étudiées s’étalaient entre 22,95 et 35,25 sur la zone
d’étude, ce qui indiquait une limitation en P au niveau local. Chez toutes les espèces, les rapports N/P sont apparus
s’accroître durant la sénescence et, au niveau de la plante, le statut de N et P n’était pas strictement contrôlé par les
concentrations en N et P des feuilles, vertes et sénescentes ; toutes les espèces ont montré une résorption complète
en fonction de valeurs-seuils. Nos résultats impliquent que la PRE joue un rôle plus important dans la conservation
du P que la NRE dans celle de N. Ainsi, dans notre zone d’étude, les deux espèces A. hyrcanum subsp.
sphaerocaryum avec sa plus forte PRE (basée tant sur la masse que sur la surface) et C. mahaleb qui est l’espèce la
plus P-proficiente, ont de meilleurs avantages compétitifs que les autres espèces à utiliser efficacement P dans les
sols qui en sont pauvres.
SUMMARY.— In the North of Turkey, foliar nutrient concentrations during summer and autumn and foliar
resorption efficiency (RE) and proficiency (RP) were investigated in some sympatric deciduous plant species
occurring on soils with low phosphorus availability. NRE and PRE were found to be within the ranges reported by
other studies for the same studied species. The highest mass and area-based N and P concentrations were found in
A. hyrcanum subsp. sphaerocaryum. The highest mass and area-based NRE were also found in A. hyrcanum
subsp. sphaerocaryum, while the highest mass and area-based PRE were found in S.umbellata var. umbellata.
However, the opposite trend was found when MLCF correction was used for both species. The most N and P-
proficient species was C. mahaleb because the lowest N and P concentrations were found in its senesced leaves.
However, the most N-proficient species was S. umbellata var. umbellata regarding mass-based NRP. N/P ratios of
green leaves of the studied species ranged from 22.95 to 35.25 in the study area and this indicated that P limitation
may occur at a local level. It has been found that N/P ratios were increased during senescence in all species. Plant
N and P status was not strictly controlled by N and P concentrations of green and senesced leaves in the studied
species; all of these show complete resorption according to threshold values. Our results implied that PRE has a
much important role in conservation of P as compared to NRE conservation of N. In the study area, compared to
other species, A. hyrcanum subsp. sphaerocaryum with the highest both mass- and area-based PRE and C.
mahaleb which is the most P-proficient species, have competitive advantages for an effective use of P in P-poor
soils.
________________________________________________
Nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) are the primary nutrients that limit growth in natural
environments (Vitousek & Howarth, 1991; Marschner, 1995; Koerselman & Meuleman, 1996;
48
Aerts & Chapin, 2000). They are largely withdrawn from senescent leaves before abscission, and
used for new growth or stored in vegetative tissue until the next growing season. Especially N
deficiency promotes drastic consequences during plant development period. P is a component of
important macromolecules like nucleic acids and phospholipids and important especially for
energy transfer and metabolism (Miatto et al., 2016).
Forest trees and shrubs resorbed sizeable proportions of nutrients from leaves before leaf
abscission and resorption increases the control of the individual plant over the nutrient resources
and allows the plant to reutilize them (Kutbay et al., 2003; Van Heerwaarden et al., 2003; Yuan et
al., 2005a). There is a large gap in understanding the scale and the mechanisms of intraspecific
variation in nutrient behaviour in plants, especially in long-lived plants such as trees (Oleksyn et
al., 2002; Brant & Chen, 2015). Foliar resorption of nutrients is a key process in ecosystem
nutrient cycling because it makes plants less dependent on current nutrient uptake (Aerts &
Chapin, 2000; Hagen-Thorn et al., 2006; Covelo et al., 2008).
Foliar resorption can be expressed in two ways as resorption efficiency and proficiency.
Foliar resorption process is commonly quantified as resorption efficiency and is defined as the
percentage of a nutrient recovered from a senescing leaf (Aerts, 1996; Aerts & Chapin, 2000;
Hoch et al,. 2003). Resorption proficiency (RP) is defined as the residual nutrient concentration in
senesced leaves (Killingbeck, 1996).
Mixed temperate deciduous forests include many sympatric species which have different
forms (i.e climbers, shrubs, etc.) and these sympatric species show some differences with respect
to foliar nutrient use strategies (Kutbay, 2001). Mass and area-based nitrogen and phosphorus
concentrations during summer and autumn and nitrogen and phosphorus efficiency and
proficiency (NRE, PRE, NRP and PRP) were investigated in a mixed deciduous forest in some
sympatric species in the north of Turkey. This study is aimed at: (a) determining whether
significant differences among deciduous sympatric species with respect to NRE, PRE, NRP and
PRP are or not present in a mixed deciduous forest in Northern Turkey; (b) examining the
relationships between foliar resorption and N/P ratios; and (c) finding which species among co-
occurring ones are the most efficient for the use of N and P on P-poor soils in a mixed deciduous
forest.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
THE STUDY AREA AND THE COLLECTION OF SAMPLES
The studied species were collected in the north of Turkey from a mixed deciduous forest around the slopes of Abaci
Mountain (35° 56' 00" - 36° 10' 30" N and 40° 39' 58" - 40° 44' 45" E; 700 m a.s.l.) which includes many characteristic
deciduous woody species of Euro-Siberian phytogeographical region. Sedimentary and ultrabasic rocks are widespread in
the study area which has highly curled and cracked tectonic structure (Kurter & Yildiz, 1986). The mean annual
temperature and precipitation are respectively 13.5oC and 449.6 mm in the study area; Q (Emberger’s pluviothermic
quotient) value is 48.4 and the area belongs to semiarid cold Mediterranean bioclimate (Akman, 1999; Kaya et al,. 2010).
Five 20 x 20 m plots were sampled. They were selected to have closed tree canopies on southwest-facing slopes. Five
dominant species were selected from canopy (Acer hyrcanum Fisch. & Mey subsp. sphaerocaryum) and subcanopy (Sorbus
umbellata (Desf.) Fritsch var. umbellata, Cerasus mahaleb (L.) Miller var. mahaleb, Quercus pubescens Willd., and
Cionura erecta (L.) Griseb.). The individuals were selected ≥ 3 m from the stems of neighbouring canopy trees to avoid
potential microsite variation (Boerner & Koslowsky, 1989) and they were flagged. Since sun and shade leaves may differ in
foliar nutrient concentrations, only outer sun leaves were collected (Kutbay & Kilinc, 1994). Green and senesced leaves
were taken from four individual plants and they were pooled for nutrient analysis (Zhang et al., 2015) during August and
November 2008, respectively for each plot (Fig. 1). When a leaf or at least two-thirds of its area turned yellow or brown, it
was considered senesced (Williams-Linera, 2000). Determination of the measurement basis can be done by preselecting
mature leaves that are to be collected when they have senesced. Preselection also minimises the chance of comparing green
and senesced leaves of different cohorts (Van Heerwaarden et al., 2003).
Taxonomic nomenclature for plant species followed that of Guner et al,. (2012).

49
Months
Species 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
A. hyrcanum NG FL FL FR FR FR FLE FR FR SEN SD
C. mahaleb NG FL FL FL FR FR FLE FR FR SEN SD
C. erecta NG NG FL FL FL FR FLE FR FR SEN SD
Q. pubescens NG NG FLE FL FR SEN SD
S.umbellata NG NG NG FL FR FLE FR FR SEN SD

Vegetative phase
Flowering phase FL
Full leaf expansion FLE
Fruiting phase FR
Seedling phase SD
Senescence SEN
No growth NG

Figure1.— Phenological calendar of the studied species.
CHEMICAL ANALYSES
Leaf area of each species was measured with a leaf-area meter (LI-3000, LI-COR, USA) (Kutbay et al., 2003; Kilic et
al., 2010). Leaf samples were dried at 70°C until constant weight, ground, and sieved. They were then extracted with a
mixture of concentrated HCl and HNO (3:1) with the exception of samples for N analysis. This digest was filtered through
3
a Whatman filter paper no. 42. Nitrogen was determined by the micro Kjeldahl method with a Kjeltec Auto 1030 Analyser
(Tecator, Sweden) after digesting the samples in concentrated HSO with a selenium catalyst. P was determined with
2 4
stannous chloride method by using a Jenway 6105 ultraviolet/visible spectrophotometer (Allen et al., 1986). Nutrient
concentrations in leaves were expressed on a leaf mass (mg g-1) and area (mg/dm2) basis.
Nitrogen resorption efficiency (NRE) was calculated as the percentage reduction in leaf nutrient from green to
senesced leaves (Killingbeck, 1996; Miatto et al., 2016). Nitrogen and phosphorus resorption efficiency was calculated by
the following formulas:
NRE = (N-N)/N * 100 PRE = (P-P)/P * 100
g s g g s g
where N and P = N and P concentration in mature green leaves, Ns and Ps = N and P concentrations in senesced leaves
g g
(Lima et al., 2006; Miatto et al., 2016).
Foliar resorption was also calculated as resorption proficiency (RP). RP Proficiency is simply the amount of a nutrient
that remains in fully senesced leaves (sensu Killingbeck, 1996).
Vergutz et al. (2012) emphasized that if a mass loss correction factor was not used RE would be underestimated due
to the loss of dry mass during senescence. Mass loss correction factor (MLCF) is defined as the ratio of dry mass of
senesced leaves to the dry mass of green leaves. So nitrogen and phosphorus resorption efficiency (NRE and PRE) (%) was
also calculated by using MLCF (van Heerwaarden et al., 2003; Vergutz et al., 2012).
Five soil samples of 0-30 cm depth were collected in each forest using an auger. The soil samples were air dried and
then sieved to pass through a 2-mm screen. The pH values were measured in deionized water (1:1). Soil nitrogen was
determined by the micro Kjeldahl method. Soil available phosphorus (g.kg-1) was spectrophotometrically determined by
Olsen method following extraction by sodium bicarbonate. Organic matter concentration was determined using the
Walkley-Black method (Allen et al., 1986).
Soil pH are slightly alkaline. Soil N and organic matter concentrations of soil are high, while soil phosphorus
concentration is rather low (Tab. I).

TABLE I
Soil properties in the study area
Soil trait Mean ± SD Significance
pH 7.71 ± 0.05 0.001**
Soil total N concentration 0.26 ± 0.02 0.001**
Available phosphorus 1.93 ± 1.07 0.001**
Organic matter (%) 4.23 ± 0.87 0.002**
*P<0.01 SD: Standard deviation.
STATISTICAL ANALYSES
Repeated multivariate analyses of variance (R-MANOVA) were applied to leaf traits to show significant differences
among the studied species. Multivariate General Linear Models procedure were used. Regression between green and
50
senesced leaf N/P ratio and N and P concentrations of green and senesced leaves were also calculated. R-MANOVA and
regression were carried out by using SPSS Version 10.0 (IBM Corp. 2012). Dependent and independent variables were
foliar nutrient concentrations and foliar resorption, and species, and localities, respectively. Following analysis of variance,
Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) test was used to rank means. Data were tested for normality using the
Kolmogorov–Smirnov test.
RESULTS
There were significant differences among the studied species regarding leaf traits except for
SLA and P concentrations of senescence leaves and green leaf N/P ratio. Regression between
green and senesced leaf N/P ratios and green and senesced leaf N and P concentrations were not
found to be significant (Tabs II & III). It has been found that N/P ratios were increased during
senescence (Tab. IV).

TABLE II
R-MANOVA test for leaf traits

Source Dependent Variable df Mean F-value Significance
Square
Green Leaf weight g 4 1.84 8.34 0.001**
Green Leaf Area dm2 4 1.96 6.52 0.003*
Green Leaf SLA 4 0.31 5.67 0.050*
Green Leaf N % 4 0.65 10.56 0.001**
Green Leaf N mg/g 4 19.77 12.41 0.001**
Green Leaf N g/dm2 4 14.82 6.91 0.002**
Green Leaf P % 4 0.01 31.8 0.440*
Green Leaf P mg/g 4 0.03 5.69 0.005**
Green Leaf P g/dm2 4 0.10 5.95 0.004**
Green Leaf N/P 4 19.23 0.57 0.690NS
Senescence Leaf weight g 4 1.92 4.17 0.018*
Species Senecence Leaf area dm2 4 1.94 3.32 0.039*
Senecence Leaf SLA 4 0.02 0.77 0.560NS
Senescence Leaf N% 4 0.28 16.92 0.001**
Senescence Leaf N mg/g 4 2.98 7.10 0.002**
Senescence Leaf N g/dm2 4 2.33 4.57 0.013*
Senescence Leaf P % 4 0.01 0.31 0.865NS
Senescence Leaf P mg/g 4 0.001 0.74 0.581NS
Senescence Leaf P g/dm2 4 0.002 1.28 0.322NS
Senescence Leaf N/P 4 0.01 5.95 0.004*
NS: Not significant * p<0.05 ** p<0.01 df:Degrees of freedom.

TABLE III
Regression analysis between green leaf N/P ratio and senescence leaf N and P concentrations
Model Std. Error t-value Significance
Dependent Variable: Green Leaf N/P (Constant) 3.80 6.437 0.001
Sen*.N (mg/g) 7.31 -0.515 0.614
Sen.N (g/dm2) 7.66 0.592 0.563
Sen.P (mg/g) 18.07 0.408 0.689
Sen.P (g/dm2) 20.18 -0.366 0.719
Dependent Variable: Senescence Leaf N/P (Constant) 18.72 1.585 0.134
Green*.N (mg/g) 2.68 0.531 0.603
Green.N (g/dm2) 3.47 -0.133 0.896
Green P (mg/g) 36.25 0.148 0.884
Green .P (g/dm2) 36.23 -0.518 0.612
* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; Sen: Senescence

51
TABLE IV
N/P ratios of green and senesced leaves of the studied species

Green Senescence
N Mean SD Mean SD
A. hyrcanum 4 26.90 0.83 43.615 7.767
C. mahaleb 4 21.57 1.30 24.347 7.295
C. erecta 4 15.90 7.17 31.280 5.002
Q. pubescens 4 24.20 0.98 37.312 5.092
S.umbellata 4 22.84 2.52 23.223 2.821
SD: Standard deviation.

Green leaf SLA was significantly changed among species, while senesced leaf SLA was not
(Fig. 2).

Figure 2.— Boxplots of specific leaf area (SLA (dm2/g) values of the studied species.
Bars indicate standard deviation of means. Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different at the 0.05
level using Tukey’s HSD test.

The highest mass and area-based N and P concentrations were found in A. hyrcanum subsp.
sphaerocaryum (Figs. 3 & 4).
52
Figure 3.— Boxplots of mass (mg/g) and area-based (mg/dm2) N concentrations of the studied species.
Bars indicate standard deviation of means. Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different at the 0.05
level using Tukey’s HSD test.

The highest mass and area-based NRE were also found in A. hyrcanum subsp.
sphaerocaryum, while the highest mass and area-based PRE were found in S.umbellata var.
umbellata.

53
Figure 4.— Boxplots of mass (mg/g) and area-based (mg/dm2) P concentrations of the studied species.
Bars indicate standard deviation of means. Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different at the 0.05
level using Tukey’s HSD test.
However, the opposite trend was found when MLCF correction was used for both species
(Figs. 5 & 6).
54
Figure 5.— Boxplots of mass (mg/g) and area-based (dm2/mg) NRE and PRE of the studied species.
Bars indicate standard deviation of means. Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different at the 0.05
level using Tukey’s HSD test (*=mg/g. **= mg/dm2 ).

Figure 6.— Boxplots of RE values of the studied species with mass loss correction factor (MLCF).
(*=mg/g. **= mg/dm2 ).

The most N and P-proficient species was C. mahaleb because the lowest N and P
concentrations were found in senesced leaves of C. mahaleb. However, the most N-proficient
species was S. umbellata var. umbellata regarding mass-based NRP (Fig. 7).
55
Figure 7.— Boxplots of mass (mg/g) and area-based (mg/dm2) NRP and PRP of the studied species.
Bars indicate standard deviation of means. Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different at the 0.05
level using Tukey’s HSD test.

N/P ratio of senesced leaves were significantly changed, while N/P ratios of green-leaves
were not (Fig. 8).

Figure 8.— Boxplots of N/P ratios of green and senesced leaves.
Bars indicate standard deviation of means. Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different at the 0.05
level using Tukey’s HSD test.
56
DISCUSSION
Aerts (1996) reported that the mean resorption efficiency in deciduous species is 54.0 %. It
has been reported that NRE and PRE range 26-61 % and 56-71 %, respectively in deciduous
species (Boerner, 1984; Côte et al., 2002). Brant & Chen (2015) suggested NRE and PRE are 70.2
and 59.0, respectively in woody deciduous species. NRE and PRE in our studied species fall
within the ranges reported by other studies.
Mass and area-based PRE was found to be higher than NRE in A. hyrcanum subsp.
sphaerocaryum, C. mahaleb and C.erecta. Leaf P compounds is readily resorbed, while resorption
of leaf N compounds is a bit slow and PRE is of great importance with respect to nutrient use
efficiency (Aerts & Chapin, 2000; Covelo et al., 2008; Salazar et al., 2011; Yilmaz et al., 2014).
Our study area is severely P-limited and it has been reported that species growing in P-limiting
conditions would be more favoured by high resorption efficiency and that in P-poor soils
phosphorus is more limiting than nitrogen (Covelo et al., 2008; Kilic et al., 2012; Miatto et al.,
2016). It has also been stated that limiting nutrients are usually more resorbed than non-limiting
ones and species on infertile soils rely more on foliar resorption as compared to species on fertile
soils (Yilmaz et al., 2014; Brant & Chen 2015; Miatto et al., 2016).
Fife et al. (2008) indicated that the nutrient concentration of a leaf is strongly influenced by
its mass which varies among species. Significant differences were indeed found among our studied
species with respect to mass-based N concentrations. There were also significant differences
among our studied species with respect to mass-based green leaf N concentrations, while mass-
based P concentrations of senesced leaves were not significantly changed.
Several researchers (Jurik, 1986; Popma & Bongers, 1988; Bigelow, 1993) found that SLA
declined from the top to the bottom of the canopy. However, this trend was not found for our
studied species. Kutbay (2001) also did not find such a trend with respect to SLA. It has also been
suggested that subcanopy species have lower foliar resorption values than canopy species in the
same area (De Mars & Boerner, 1997). However in the present study, some of the subcanopy
species had higher NRE and PRE than canopy species. There were some evidences in favour of a
novel mechanism whereby climber species have some competitive advantages for an economical
use of nutrients (Cai & Bongers, 2007).
Wood et al. (2011) found that species with low SLA tended to resorb more P relative to N,
while opposite trend was found for the species with high SLA. In other words, the species with
high SLA tended to resorb more N relative to P. C. erecta had the lowest SLA. Mass and area-
based PRE without MLCF correction were found to be higher than NRE in C. erecta. The highest
SLA was found in C. mahaleb. However, only mass-based NRE was found to be higher than PRE
in C. mahaleb when MLCF correction was used. It was also supported by high N/P ratio during
senescence. It has been found that N/P ratio was increased during senescence. This suggests
preferential resorption of P relative to N.
The overall elemental composition of plants in a particular ecosystem is simultaneously
determined by sympatric species and by the physiological status of the dominant species (Ågren,
2008). Güsewell (2004) reported a broader range for N- (< 10) and P-limitation (> 20). N/P ratios
above 16 indicate P deficiency, whilst N/P ratios below 14 indicate N deficiencies, and foliar N/P
ratio below 12.5 indicate an optimal P nutrition (Aerts & Chapin, 2000; Finzi et al., 2004;
Haridasan, 2008). Koerselman & Meuleman (1996) suggested that threshold values for P-
limitation was 16. N/P ratios of green leaves of our studied species ranged from 22.95 to 35.25 and
this indicated that P limitation may occur at a local level (Rentería et al., 2005). The highest N/P
ratio was found in A. hyrcanum subsp. sphaerocaryum and this species had the highest PRE with
and without MLCF. However, the highest PRP was found for C. mahaleb. Diehl et al., (2008) and
Du et al., (2011) suggested that the critical values of N/P ratio and N- and P-limitation would vary
57