Manmade Modular Megastructures (Architectural Design March April 2006, Vol. 76, No. 1)

130 Pages·2006·13.52 MB·English

by  Ian Abley

AD.76.1 covers 19/5/06 12:19 pm Page 2
4
Manmade Modular
Megastructures
Project1 18/5/06 7:23 pm Page 4
4Architectural Design
Backlist Titles
Volume 74 No. 4 Volume 74 No. 5 Volume 74 No. 6
ISBN 047086687X ISBN 0470870753 ISBN 0470090944
Volume 75 No. 1 Volume 75 No. 2 Volume 75 No. 3
ISBN 0470870753 ISBN 047001136X ISBN 0470093285
Volume 75 No. 4 Volume 75 No. 5 Volume 75 No. 6
ISBN 0470090936 ISBN 0470014679 ISBN 0470024186
Individual backlist issues of 4are available for purchase
at £22.50. To order and subscribe for 2006 see page 128.
Project1 18/5/06 7:23 pm Page 5
4Architectural Design
Forthcoming Titles 2006
March/April 2006, Profile No 180
Techniques + Technologies in Morphogenetic Design
Guest-edited by Michael Hensel, Achim Menges and Michael Weinstock
4 This issue of3introduces a new approach to architectural practice based on the interrelationship of emer-
gence and self-organisation concepts. A sequel to the successful Emergence: Morphogenetic Design Strategiestitle by
the same guest-editors, it advances on the previous publication by taking on board the latest developments for
fully integrated design evolution, manufacturing and construction.
Techniques + Technologies in Emergence requires the recognition of architectural structures not as singular and fixed bodies, but as com-
Morphogenetic
Design plex energy and material systems that have a lifespan, exist as part of the environment of other active systems,
and as an iteration of a series that proceeds by evolutionary development. Thus the focal point of this issue will
be the exploration of techniques and technologies that enable the implementation of such morphogenetic
strategies, requiring a new set of intellectual and practical skills. Though the publication stands alone as an
investigation and presentation of cutting-edge techniques and technologies within the design and construction
field, supported by examples from adjacent industries, it also introduces a new springboard for understanding
and rethinking the radical changes in which architecture is now being conceived, designed and produced.
While representing a timely exploration of the embedding of techniques and technology in an alternative
design approach, it also presents wholly new strategies for tackling issues of sustainability.
May/June 2006, Profile No 181
The New Europe
Guest-edited by Valentina Croci
4 In May 2004, Europe was redefined. Ten countries – Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia,
Lithuania, Malta, Poland, the Slovak Republic and Slovenia – joined the European Union. The full impact of the
forces that this historical event unleashed has yet to be understood. For not only will Europe’s enlargement have
an unequivocal bearing on ‘old’ Europe, but also on the countries of ‘new Europe’. As the economic and political
balance of the enlarged European Union is being redrawn, the identities of the newly joined countries is in flux –
the majority of the joining states were under communist rule less than two decades ago.
Contemporary architecture in these 10countries necessarily presents itself as a process that is anything but
linear. It has to deal with the hybridisation, with new global trends, as well as with the permanence of struc-
tures and national heritage. Architects, mostly practising in the private rather than public sphere, are contend-
ing with the various political inconsistencies of administrations undergoing change.
The very different panorama in each new member state avoids generalisation. As a broken mirror, this issue
of 2provides a partial view of the very crucial issues that contemporary architecture has to cope with. Local
The New
contributors look at the trans-formation of the city and national heritage, while also spotting a new genera-
Europe
tional fringe of local architects. The cultural richness and ethnic diversity drawn by this publication also raise
the looming question of what the identity of the new Europe might be in the future.
July/August 2006, Profile No 182
Programming Cultures: Art and Architecture in the Age of Software
Guest-edited by Mike Silver
4 An exploration of the relationship between software engineering and the various disciplines that benefit from
new tools, this title of 3, which was inspired by a Symposium at the Pratt Institute in New York, focuses on
how artists and architects are writing new codes to solve visualisation and data-processing problems. It extends
the potential of programming for architecture far beyond the scope of popular, appropriated systems such as
Form-Z, Maya and 3D Studio MAX. Programming is advocated as a discipline central to the development of
design and a key to unlocking new ways of working rather than as a mere service to generative design and con-
struction. Programming Culturesfeatures the work of seminal figures such as Frank Gehry, Greg Lynn and John
Fraser. It also presents the important new work of emerging young designers like Casey Reas, Evan Douglis
and Mike Silver.
Programming Cultures:
Art + Architecture in the Age of Software
AD MMM 001-002 18/5/06 7:09 pm Page 1
4
Manmade Modular
Megastructures
Guest-edited by Ian Abley + Jonathan Schwinge
AD MMM 001-002 18/5/06 7:09 pm Page 2
4
ISBN-13 9780470016237
ISBN-10 047001623x
Profile No 179
Vol 76 No 1
Acknowledgements We are grateful to Simon Punter Photography Audacity is a campaigning company that
Jonathan and Ian thank all of the contributors for images in this issue of 4identified advocates developing the manmade
to this issue of 4, along with all those who, with the initials SPP. Simon is working with environment, using manufacturing on the
over the course of researching the theme of audacity on a larger photographic survey grandest of architectural scales, and free
the magazine, gave invaluable advice and of the Thames Estuary growth area, with from the burden of ‘sustainable’ and
criticism. Special thanks go to Martin Pawley. a working title of This is Thames Gateway, ‘communitywaddle’. In the process, audacity
We would particularly like to thank Corinna which we aim to publish later in 2006. organises authoritative international research,
Simon, Nic Bailey, Jane Wernick, Patrick large conferences and a provocative website:
Turnbull, Toby Maclean at TALLengineers, Kate www.audacity.org. It represents a dynamic
Abley, Pierre d’Avoine, Claire Melhuish, school of critical writers, public speakers
Matthew Priestman, John Conroy, Michael We also thank Tekla Structures for their and photographers, many of whom have
30 Trudgeon, David Nixon, Frederic Schwartz, support. contributed to this issue of 4.
Kisho Kurokawa, Paul Andreu, Dominique
Perrault, Simon Allford, Will Alsop, William
McLean, Samantha Hardingham, Alistair Gibb,
Jackie Britton, Paul Reeves, Matthias Hamm, All satellite images are courtesy of Space
Frank Turner and all at Project Redsand, Imaging (www.spaceimaging.com), who we
Torquil Macintosh at Sybarite, and Jacob thank for their kind support.
Dunkl at Querkraft. Thanks also to Caroline
Ellerby for her support at Wiley, and Helen
Castle for her constant enthusiasm and
encouragement. May this enquiry continue
and expand in scope.
Editorial Offices All Rights Reserved. No part of this Prices are for six issues and include postage 66 © Kawasaki Heavy Industries; p 67(t) © Y
International House publication may be reproduced, stored in a and handling charges. Periodicals postage Takase; pp 69-71 © Eugene Tsui; pp 72-73
Ealing Broadway Centre retrieval system or transmitted in any form or paid at Jamaica, NY 11431. Air freight and © THINK (Ban, Schwartz, Smith, Vinoly); pp
London W5 5DB by any means, electronic, mechanical, mailing in the USA by Publications Expediting 77 & 83(t) © Balthazar Korab; p 78(l) © Ralph
photocopying, recording, scanning or Services Inc, 200 Meacham Avenue, Elmont, Rapson, architect; p 78(r) © Cranbrook
T: [phone] otherwise, except under the terms NY 11003 Archives; p 79 © Cranbrook Archives, photo
F: [phone] of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act Richard Shirk; p 80 reproduced from
E: [email protected] 1988 or under the terms of a licence issued Individual rate subscriptions must be paid by Architectural Forum, 67, 1937, p 40(t&c), and
by the Copyright Licensing Agency Ltd, 90 personal cheque or credit card. Individual rate Architectural Forum, October 1941, p 40(b); p
Editor Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 4LP, UK, subscriptions may not be resold or used as 81 © Ezra Stoller/ESTO; p 83 © Alan Temko;
Helen Castle without the permission in writing of the library copies. pp 84-85 © Worldwrite Volunteers; pp 86-89
Publisher. courtesy Gordon Murray; pp 90-91 & 93 ©
Design and Editorial Management Subscription Offices UK Canadian Centre for Architecture, Montréal,
Mariangela Palazzi-Williams Requests to the Publisher should be John Wiley & Sons Ltd Cedric Price Archive; p 92 © Stanley
addressed to: Journals Administration Department Mathews; p 94 © Michael D Webb; pp 96-99
Art Direction/Design Permissions Department 1 Oldlands Way, Bognor Regis © theboxtank; pp 100-103 © YRM; p 104 ©
Christian Küsters (CHK Design) John Wiley & Sons Ltd West Sussex, PO22 9SA RotoVision SA, photo Columbia/Tri-Star/The
The Atrium T: [phone] Kobal Collection; p 105(l) © RotoVision SA,
Design Southern Gate F: [phone] photo 20th Century Fox; p 105(r) ©
Hannah Dumphy (CHK Design) Chichester E: [email protected] RotoVision SA, photo New Line/The Kobal
West Sussex PO19 8SQ Collection; p 106 © RotoVision SA, photo
Project Coordinator and Picture Editor England Postmaster Ladd Company/Warner Brothers/The Kobal
Caroline Ellerby Send address changes to 3 Publications Collection.
F: [phone] Expediting Services, 200 Meacham Avenue,
Advertisement Sales E: [email protected] Elmont, NY 11003 4+
Faith Pidduck/Wayne Frost pp 110–111 © McLaren Group, photos Paul
T [phone] Printed in Italy by Conti Tipocolor. Grundy; pp 112(r) & 113 © Foster and
E [email protected] All prices are subject to change Credits Partners, photos Nigel Young; p 112(l) ©
without notice. Foster and Partners; pp 114-115 ©
Editorial Board [ISSN: 0003-8504] Abbreviated positions McGauran Giannini Soon, photos John
Will Alsop, Denise Bratton, Adriaan Beukers, b = bottom, c = centre, l = left, r = right Gollings; pp 116-118 © McGauran Giannini
André Chaszar, Peter Cook, Teddy Cruz, 4is published bimonthly and is available to Soon, photos Peter Bennetts; p 119 ©
Max Fordham, Massimiliano Fuksas, purchase on both a subscription basis and Front and back cover: Jonathan Schwinge, McGauran Giannini Soon, photo Diana
Edwin Heathcote, Anthony Hunt, as individual volumes at the following prices. Mega-Rural megastructural housing for a Snape; pp 120-121 © Will McLean; pp 122-
Charles Jencks, Jan Kaplicky, Robert Maxwell, rural setting, 2005. Image © Jonathan 123 © JC Muirhead; p 124 © Niall
Jayne Merkel, Monica Pidgeon, Single Issues Schwinge. McLaughlin Architects; pp 125-127 ©
Antoine Predock, Michael Rotondi, Single issues UK: £22.50 Yoshiharu-Matsumura.
Leon van Schaik, Ken Yeang Single issues outside UK:US$45.00 4
Details of postage and packing charges pp 5, 33-37, 38, 45-48, 61(t), 68 © Jonathan
Contributing Editors available on request. Schwinge; pp 6 & 49 courtesy the European
André Chaszar Commission; p 8(br) © Bruce Mau Design,
Jeremy Melvin Annual Subscription Rates 2006 photo Bisi Williams; pp 10, 24-25, 40-41, 43,
Jayne Merkel Institutional Rate 52-53 © Ian Abley; pp 11, 12, 16, 60 © Kisho
Print only or Online only: UK£175/US$290 Kurokawa Architect & Associates; pp 13, 15,
Published in Great Britain in 2006 by Combined Print and Online: 29(t), 67(b), 74(t), 75 © Space Imaging; pp 18-
Wiley-Academy, a division of John Wiley & UK£193/US$320 19 © Fumihiko Maki and Maki and
Sons Ltd Copyright © 2006, John Wiley & Personal Rate Associates; pp 20-23 © James Heartfield; pp
Sons Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Print only: UK£99/US$155 26-27 & 28(br) © Simon Punter Photography;
Chichester, West Sussex PO19 8SQ, Student Rate p 28(t&bl) © Will Alsop; p 29(b) © Blue base
England, Telephone [phone] Print only: UK£70/US$110 London; pp 30-32 © Wilkinson Eyre
Email (for orders and customer service Architects; p 39 © Hugh Broughton
enquiries): [email protected] Architects, images by www.7-t.co.uk; p 42 ©
Visit our Home Page on Charlick + Nicholson Architects, photo
wileyeurope.com or wiley.com Natasha Nicholson; p 44 © Elsam; p 50 ©
KieranTimberlake Associates LLP; pp 54-55 ©
Eamonn O’Mahoney; pp 56-57 & 58(tr)
courtesy John McKean; p 58(tl) © John
McKean; p 59 © Louis Hellman; p 61(b)
Sybarite UK Ltd; pp 62-63 © Bee Flowers; p
2
AD MMM 003 18/5/06 4:09 pm Page 3
Contents
33
62
Editorial Standing Tall in the Estuary Functionality Rather than Good Interchange Now
Helen Castle Natasha Nicholson + Intentions in Design Robert Stewart
4 Pamela Charlick Michelle Addington 100
42 64
Introduction Hollywood’s Noir Detours: Unease
Things Will Endure Mega Rural: Made in Sunderland Biomimicry versus Humanism in the Mental Megalopolis
Less Than Us Jonathan Schwinge Joe Kaplinsky Graham Barnfield
Ian Abley 45 66 104
6
Mass-Customisation and the Our Overdeveloped Sense Building Profile
Beyond Little Britain Manufactured Module of Vulnerability McLaren Technology Centre
Ian Abley James Woudhuysen Frank Furedi Jeremy Melvin
10 49 72 110+
Fumihiko Maki Why Drive a TT and Live in a Eero Saarinen and the Practice Profile
Jennifer Taylor Broken Teapot? Manufacturing Model McGauran Giannini
18 Ian Abley Jayne Merkel Soon Architects
52 77 Shelley Penn
114+
People, Not Architecture,
Make Communities Triumph and Tragedy on Think Big for the
James Heartfield the Home Front Developing World McLean’s Nuggets
20 Martin Pawley Ceri Dingle + Viv Regan Will McLean
54 84 120+
London 2030: Taking the Thames
Gateway Seriously Prefabricating Memory Lane: Appreciating Cumbernauld Home Run
Ian Abley Whatever Happened to Systems? Gordon Murray Evelyn Road, Silvertown,
24 John McKean 86 Niall McLaughlin Architects
56 Bruce Stewart
122+
Travelling in a Straight Line Cedric Price: From the ‘Brain
Oliver Houchell Designer Volumetric at IKEAPrices Drain’ to the ‘Knowledge
30 Ian Abley Economy’ Interior Eye
60 Stanley Mathews ‘Springtecture’ B
90 Masaaki Takahashi
Cloud Piercer: Mile High
Jonathan Schwinge What’s Wrong with This 125+
33 Approach, Comrades? Waltropolis: City in a Box
Bee Flowers theboxtank (Emily Andersen,
62 Geoff DeOld +Corey Hoelker)
Architecture with Legs
96
Ian Abley + Jonathan Schwinge
38
3
AD MMM 004-005 18/5/06 4:18 pm Page 4
Editorial
Where Architects Fear to Tread …
A softly softly approach to development is now a given for architects. The sensitivity to materials, context and
scale that has come to be equated with sustainability is now established and institutionalised via legislation
and government directives. But what if the means by which we are pursuing the Holy Grail of sustainability
is too piecemeal, too tentative and too slow?
Could we simply be failing to provide accommodation for future generations?
This title of 3may not be to the taste of all our readers. The fact that we are raising the spectre that
building prefabricated structures on a greater scale might be preferable to designing diminutive bespoke
constructions may in itself seem to be detestable and fly against the very heart of architectural creation.
Many architects may simply not want to learn from the lessons of the Wal-Mart mega-shed. But what is truly
invaluable here is the fact that guest-editors Ian Abley and Jonathan Schwinge have dared to raise their heads
above the parapet and contest what has now come to be received knowledge and an increasingly accepted
way of talking and going about things.
The vision of the modular megastructure may seem, at first, to belong to another, earlier age. The words of
Buckminster Fuller and Reyner Banham are, indeed, repeatedly invoked throughout the issue. Ian Abley
juxtaposes postwar Britain with the work of the Japanese Metabolists; Jayne Merkel provides an insightful
exploration into the work of Eero Saarinen; and Stanley Mathews discusses the work of Cedric Price within
the context of postwar social and economic trends. What these architects all share in common is a boldness
of vision and conception that emanates a human optimism, which is now a complete anathema in the 21st
century. Any faith in human progress in architecture being well and truly toppled by the 1970s with the
perceived failure of Modernism and the popular disdain for the poorly produced systems building of public
housing schemes that were epitomised by the tower block.
But could our timidity in terms of the built environment also be a product of a wider lack of human self-
belief? Have we lost our faith in ‘the manmade’, and now believe that we can only move forward if it is in
some way imitative or harnessed to nature? Is it possible that by not asserting our potential, at this very
crucial point in time, to find real solutions to large-scale problems such as the demise of fossil fuel and global
warming at the level of the megastructure, we could be merely dabbling too late? Helen Castle
Jonathan Schwinge, Cloud Piercer, proposal for mile-high
megastructures in the Thames Estuary, 2005.
4
AD MMM 004-005 18/5/06 4:18 pm Page 5
AD MMM 006-009 18/5/06 4:29 pm Page 6
Introduction
Things Will Endure
Less Than Us
Ian Abley challenges the current How might architecture and engineering meet the challenges
architectural veneration of everything small of a world of 8.3billion people within the next quarter of a
century?
and tailormade. Could a correlation between
It is already clear how that population might be clothed
the small scale and the sustainable be
by 2030. Editing this text in the first week of September 2005,
entirely misplaced? Could our very
top-quality and highly affordable Chinese clothing was being
predilection for 'sensitive' diminuitive design blocked from import into Europe by Peter Mandelson, the
be causing us to completely overlook the European Commissioner for External Trade, who
potential of the megastructure? Shouldn't simultaneously insisted that ‘the benefits of free and fair
trade should be extended to all, especially the poorest’.1
we be striving to deliver reusable spaces
Decoded, this means free trade for Chinese manufacturers
with recyclable parts to the greatest number
is considered unfair, despite European retailers and their
of people? customers wanting the produce.
European Commissioner for External Trade, Peter Mandelson (left) and the
Chinese Minister of Commerce, Bo Xilai, in the middle of a trade war over
the production of clothes, Shanghai, China, 10 June 2005.
6
AD MMM 006-009 18/5/06 4:29 pm Page 7
Imagine if such productive powers were put to work in the presumption behind British Planning Policy Guidance 3:
manufacture of top-quality and affordable architecture for UK Housing.2But a megastructure creates more land as a serviced
retailers to sell to the buying public. Think of IKEAx Chinese platform, either with an all-weather envelope divorced from
manufacturing capacity and imagine an international trade the accommodation, or relying on the accommodation
dispute in construction. modules to deal with the climate. Modules are best as finished
Of course, such a scenario seems remote, but not for volumes, or maybe kits of panels, frames and components
technical reasons. It is entirely possible to imagine requiring a greater degree of fit, but with the anticipation
architectural products made anywhere in the world to be that they will wear out, become obsolete and need replacing
installed on site, whether singly or stacked up, or installed from the latest catalogues.
into a prepared infrastructure as manufactured land. Most Unfortunately the prospect that the Chinese might
people think that land is a finite resource. This is certainly the manufacture architecture as modules or modular
megastructures for export seems remote, mostly because the
UKwould resist the imports through the obstacle of the
planning system. Yet we are used to commercial offices,
shopping malls or hospitals being modest single-use
structures capable of refit. Meanwhile, the stock of single-
family, site-built dwellings in town and throughout suburbia
has accommodated change better than attempts, from the
1950s to the 1970s, at distinctly nonmegastructural
residential system building.
The question remains: Why can’t architecture be better
manufactured for modular upgrade through an
international division of labour capable of sustaining
megastructures?
Megastructure: Urban Futures of the Recent Pastwas
written 30years ago by Reyner Banham on the assumption
that, in his foreseeable future, after the Pompidou Centre in
Paris, they would no longer be built. Ultimately, he said,
megastructures were a ‘self-cancelling concept’ in attempting
to architecturally order flexibility in use over time.3This is a
flawed but still more convincing explanation for the no-show
of megastructures than that given by Colin Davies in The
Prefabricated Home.There, megastructuralism is dismissed as
Blade Runnerterritory, and for the ‘vertiginous nightmare of
the environment it creates’.4Banham had instead begun with
an almost boringly practical description of megastructures
from Ralph Wilcoxon, the planning librarian at the College
of Environmental Design, Berkeley:
• constructed of modular units
• capable of great or even ‘unlimited’ extension
• a structural framework into which smaller structural
units (for example, rooms, houses, or small buildings of
other sorts) can be built – or even ‘plugged-in’ or
‘Megastructure, the concept of a giant, adaptable, multi-purpose building
containing most of the functions of a city, was one of the dominant design themes ‘clipped-on’ after having been prefabricated elsewhere
of the late 1950s and most of the 1960s, occupying the difficult middle ground • a structural framework expected to have a useful life
between architecture and town planning. Vast, it offered architects the chance to
much longer than that of the smaller units which it
create super-monuments on a scale matching the modern city; adaptable, it
might support.5
offered the citizenry the possibility of creating their own small-scale environments
within the enormous frame. Yet in spite of these promises, architects and citizens
alike had abandoned the idea and sought more modest solutions to their needs – This is more about accommodating change than about
and ambitions – soon after 1970.’ In the flyleaf to his fascinating Megastructure:
size, as Rem Koolhaas and Bruce Mau struggled with in
Urban Futures of the Recent Past(1976), Reyner Banham notes the loss of
S,M,L,XL.6For Banham, over the period of residential system
confidence by professional and public alike. Yet megastructure may once again be
a way we might make sense of the megalopolis. building, megastructures ‘were all large buildings – but not
7