Table Of ContentArt
as
Advocacy.
Exploring
curatorial
practice
by
learning
disabled
artists
as
a
site
for
self-‐advocacy.
Jade
French
The
University
of
Leeds
School
of
Fine
Art,
History
of
Art
and
Cultural
Studies
October
2017
1
The
candidate
confirms
that
the
work
submitted
is
her
own
and
that
appropriate
credit
has
been
given
where
reference
has
been
made
to
the
work
of
others.
This
copy
has
been
supplied
on
the
understanding
that
it
is
copyright
material
and
that
no
quotation
from
the
thesis
may
be
published
without
proper
acknowledgement.
The
right
of
Jade
French
to
be
identified
as
Author
of
this
work
has
been
asserted
by
her
in
accordance
with
the
Copyright,
Designs
and
Patents
Act
1988.
©
2017
The
University
of
Leeds
and
Jade
French
2
Acknowledgements
I
would
like
to
extend
thanks
to
the
many
people
who
so
generously
contributed
to,
and
supported
the
work
presented
in
this
thesis.
Firstly,
I
would
like
to
thank
the
curators
-‐
Leah
Jones,
Hannah
Bellass,
Tony
Caroll,
Diana
Disley
and
Eddie
Rauer,
the
artists
-‐
James
Harper,
Mark
Simmonds
and
Alaena
Turner,
and
support
-‐
Abi
Burrows
and
Donna
Bellass,
for
their
generous
insight,
hard
work
and
unwavering
commitment
during
this
project.
They
attended
a
year’s
worth
of
weekly
workshops
with
enthusiasm,
and
I
really
could
not
have
done
this
research
without
them.
Their
passion
for
both
the
arts
and
advocacy
remains
a
source
of
inspiration
to
me.
I
would
like
to
also
thank
my
brilliant
supervisory
team
-‐
Helen
Graham,
Mal
Hampson,
Bec
Fearon
and
Emma
Rushton.
My
PhD
has
been
a
truly
amazing
experience
and
I
believe
this
is
mostly
down
to
the
fantastic
support
I
received.
I
thank
them
wholeheartedly
for
their
generous
time
and
encouragement,
and
for
also
giving
me
so
many
wonderful
opportunities
along
the
way.
Special
mention
to
Helen
Graham
for
her
tremendous
academic
support,
from
enabling
me
to
pursue
the
PhD
scholarship
to
writing
this
thesis.
Thank
you,
thank
you,
thank
you.
Many
thanks
to
the
staff
at
all
the
partner
organisations
-‐
Halton
Speak
Out,
Bluecoat,
University
of
Leeds
-‐
who
contributed
time
and
welcomed
me
into
their
places
of
work.
This
project
would
also
not
have
been
carried
out
without
financial
support.
A
big
thank
you
to
the
Arts
and
Humanities
Research
Council
for
selecting
this
project
for
scholarship,
the
Arts
Council
England
for
contributing
to
the
exhibitions
costs,
and
the
White
Rose
College
of
Arts
and
Humanities
who
have
personally
supported
me
to
attend
a
range
of
training
and
international
conferences
to
disseminate
this
work.
I
am
so
grateful
for
the
experiences
their
contributions
have
afforded
me.
Finally,
but
by
no
means
least,
thank
you
to
my
family
and
friends.
Melaneia
-‐
thank
you
for
the
many
conversations
and
words
of
encouragement,
Andy
-‐
thanks
for
listening
(and
for
the
brews).
3
Abstract
Over
the
past
40
years
within
the
UK
the
concept
of
self-‐advocacy
has
gained
momentum
by
enabling
learning
disabled
people
to
speak
out
in
order
to
affect
change.
In
the
same
period,
inclusive
approaches
have
been
taken
up
both
in
research
and
in
the
arts,
reflecting
a
growing
recognition
of
learning
disabled
people
as
researchers,
artists,
performers
and
communicators.
Yet
curation
has
rarely
been
used
as
an
inclusive
practice
and
then
principally
in
museums
dealing
with
history
rather
than
in
the
context
of
art
galleries.
Via
a
practice-‐led
research
approach,
Art
as
Advocacy
addressed
this
gap
by
exploring
the
potential
for
curatorial
practice
by
learning
disabled
artists
to
act
as
a
site
for
self-‐advocacy.
It
brought
together
members
of
self-‐advocacy
group
Halton
Speak
Out
and
members
of
Bluecoat's
inclusive
arts
project
Blue
Room,
to
curate
a
visual
arts
exhibition
titled
Auto
Agents.
These
curators
developed
an
exhibition
theme,
collaborated
with
artists,
commissioned
new
artwork
and
designed
accessible
interpretation
for
audiences.
Through
curating
Auto
Agents,
the
purpose
of
this
research
has
been
to
produce
a
rich
account
of
the
ways
in
which
curatorial
and
self-‐advocacy
practices
intersect.
This
intersection,
whereby
tools
found
in
self-‐advocacy
were
carried
over
into
curatorship,
provided
new
methodologies
that
enabled
curating
to
become
an
inclusive
practice.
This
attention
to
process
results
not
only
in
curating
becoming
more
usable
by
more
people,
but
also
more
transparent
and
rigorous.
By
achieving
this,
this
research
delineates
to
understanding
the
processes
and
practices
by
which
our
cultural
spaces
can
become
democratised.
4
Table
of
Contents
Introduction
................................................................................................................................
8
Summary
...........................................................................................................................................
10
Thesis
Structure
................................................................................................................................
11
Data
Collection
..................................................................................................................................
13
Ethical
Approval
and
Informed
Consent
..........................................................................................
13
Project
Website
.................................................................................................................................
15
The
Cast
....................................................................................................................................
16
Halton
Speak
Out
..............................................................................................................................
16
Bluecoat
............................................................................................................................................
16
Curator:
Hannah
Bellass
...................................................................................................................
17
Curator:
Tony
Carrol
.........................................................................................................................
18
Curator:
Diana
Disley
........................................................................................................................
18
Curator:
Leah
Jones
..........................................................................................................................
18
Curator:
Eddie
Raurer
.......................................................................................................................
19
Artist:
James
Harper
.........................................................................................................................
19
Artist:
Mark
Simmonds
.....................................................................................................................
19
Artist:
Alaena
Turner
.........................................................................................................................
20
Support:
Abi
Burrows
........................................................................................................................
20
Support:
Donna
Bellass
.....................................................................................................................
20
Act
1:
Prologue
..........................................................................................................................
21
Setting
the
Scene:
Inclusive
Arts
......................................................................................................
22
The
Self-‐Advocate
.....................................................................................................................
31
Citizens
Not
Victims
..........................................................................................................................
31
‘Speaking
Out’
...................................................................................................................................
34
Autonomy…
It’s
Complicated
...........................................................................................................
38
The
Curator
...............................................................................................................................
41
The
‘Autonomous’
Curator?
.............................................................................................................
41
No
Curator
Is
An
Island
.....................................................................................................................
45
Curator
as
Commissioner
.................................................................................................................
48
Is
Everybody
a
Curator?
....................................................................................................................
49
Act
2:
So,
What
Is
A
Curator
Anyway?
.......................................................................................
52
Visiting
Galleries
and
Museums
........................................................................................................
53
Reflecting
On
Visits
Together
...........................................................................................................
61
An
Exhibition
Theme
Emerges
..........................................................................................................
65
Act
3:
The
Commissioners
and
The
Commissioned
.....................................................................
73
5
Building
Networks
.............................................................................................................................
73
Selecting
Artists
.................................................................................................................................
76
Developing
the
Commissions
...........................................................................................................
83
Including
Existing
Artwork
................................................................................................................
93
Act
4:
Auto
Agents
.....................................................................................................................
96
That
Goes
There
................................................................................................................................
96
Reimagining
Interpretation
..............................................................................................................
99
The
Show
Must
Go
On
....................................................................................................................
103
James
Harper:
Meet
at
the
Tree
.....................................................................................................
106
Mark
Simmonds:
Book
....................................................................................................................
107
Alaena
Turner:
Secret
Action
Paintings
..........................................................................................
108
Engagement
Events
........................................................................................................................
109
Auto
Agents
at
The
Brindley
...........................................................................................................
113
Act
5:
Epilogue
........................................................................................................................
115
Bibliography
............................................................................................................................
118
Appendix
.................................................................................................................................
139
James
Harper:
Meet
At
The
Tree
....................................................................................................
139
Mark
Simmonds:
Book
....................................................................................................................
139
Alaena
Turner:
Secret
Action
Paintings
..........................................................................................
139
6
List
of
Scenes
Act
2:
So,
What
Is
A
Curator
Anyway?
.......................................................................................
52
Scene
1:
So,
What
Is
A
Curator
Anyway?
........................................................................................
52
Scene
2:
The
Fella
With
The
Scissors
...............................................................................................
57
Scene
3:
It’s
Fate!
That
Funny
Word
Again………………………………………………………………………………...
67
Act
3:
The
Commissioners
and
The
Commissioned
.....................................................................
73
Scene
1:
What
About
Joe?
...............................................................................................................
81
Scene
2:
But
We
Chose
Him?
...........................................................................................................
86
Scene
3:
It’s
Complicated
.................................................................................................................
92
Act
4:
Auto
Agents
.....................................................................................................................
96
Scene
1:
Curator
to
Curator
..............................................................................................................
96
Scene
2:
Black
Hat
..........................................................................................................................
105
Scene
3:
The
Elephant
Man
............................................................................................................
111
7
Introduction
“I
went
from
an
artist
who
makes
things
to
an
artist
who
makes
things
happen”
(Deller,
2012).
I
am
an
artist-‐facilitator
who
has
been
running
participatory
and
inclusive
arts
projects
since
2009.
During
this
time,
I
have
worked
almost
exclusively
alongside
learning
disabled
people
to
explore
the
intersections
of
art,
disability
and
social
change,
often
examining
constructs
of
access,
agency
and
inclusion.
My
work
has
primarily
taken
the
form
of
art
exhibitions
and
workshop
programmes
but
I
have
also
produced
a
number
of
collaborative
book
projects,
films
and
zines.
As
this
type
of
work
typically
involves
vast
networks
of
people,
places,
organisations
and
institutions,
it
has
a
myriad
of
possible
labels.
Whilst
I
choose
to
describe
myself
as
an
artist-‐facilitator,
this
practice
is
also
akin
to
that
of
an
inclusive
artist,
relational
artist,
community
artist,
collaborative
artist,
participatory
artist
and
socially-‐engaged
artist
to
name
a
few
of
the
possible
descriptors.
My
label
of
choice
‘artist-‐facilitator’
is
used
to
define
an
artist
whose
role
requires
them
to
enable
others,
often
acting
as
a
mediator,
translator,
catalyst
and
synergist.
At
the
core
of
this
practice
artist-‐facilitators
use
their
own
“knowledge
and
skills
to
facilitate
and
enable
other’s
creativity”
(Pringle,
2011,
p.
37),
often
employing
creative
ways
of
looking
at
and
engaging
with
art
through
a
process
that
is
active,
experiential
and
one
that
has
the
capacity
to
scaffold
learning.
When
effective,
it
is
hoped
that
this
learning
is
mutually
beneficial
and
able
to
travel
beyond
‘those
in
the
room’
to
stakeholders,
and
furthermore,
out
into
the
public
realm.
For
me,
the
journey
to
this
PhD
began
staring
into
the
window
of
a
temp
agency.
I
had
moved
to
London
in
2009
after
undertaking
a
photography
degree.
To
support
the
many
unpaid
internships
at
galleries
and
museums,
I
needed
easy,
flexible,
paid
work.
Do
you
need
flexible
working
hours?
Can
you
support
someone
with
everyday
tasks?
Can
you
offer
flexible
approaches
to
support?
Apply
Within.
Not
only
was
this
my
first
job
as
a
support
worker,
it
was
my
first
experience
of
learning
disabled
people
all
together.
Needless
to
say
the
job
wasn’t
easy,
but
it
was
unique
and
challenged
me
creatively
which
spurred
me
to
seek
out
more
opportunities
like
it.
A
year
or
so
later
I
began
working
for
a
self-‐advocacy
organisation
and
was
asked
to
run
an
art
group,
and
so
my
two
seemingly
separate
lives
collided;
art
and
advocacy.
8
Eager
to
simultaneously
consolidate
and
unravel
this
practice
in
aim
to
think
more
critically
about
my
work,
in
2011
I
undertook
an
MA
in
Inclusive
Arts
Practice
at
the
University
of
Brighton.
During
my
MA,
which
focused
on
collaboration
and
studio
practices
in
the
context
of
learning
disability
arts,
I
discovered
that
there
was
little
engagement
with
curatorial
practices
in
inclusive
arts
contexts
and
specifically,
how
to
involve
learning
disabled
people
into
this
process.
This
concept
became
my
dissertation
project
for
which
I
facilitated
a
group
of
learning
disabled
women
from
Barnet
Mencap
to
curate
an
exhibition
in
East
London's
Hoxton
Arches,
titled
You
Are
Artists,
I
am
Curator
(2013),
laying
the
foundations
for
this
PhD
study.
For
my
MA
I
focused
on
what
practices
were
required
to
enable
this
group
to
curate.
But
it
quickly
became
apparent
that
there
was
potential
for
this
practice
to
speak
to
issues
of
self-‐advocacy
and
potentially
contribute
new
approaches
to
curatorship.
After
my
MA
I
was
keen
to
continue
exploring
this
idea.
After
searching
for
funding
models
which
were
able
to
support
collaborative
research,
I
came
across
the
Arts
and
Humanities
Research
Council’s
Collaborative
Doctoral
Award
(CDA)
scheme
which
has
been
specifically
designed
to
support
collaborations
between
universities
and
non-‐academic
organisations.
I
decided
to
instigate
an
application
and
began
by
contacting
a
self-‐advocacy
group
I
had
previously
worked
with
called
Halton
Speak
Out.
As
well
as
fulfilling
many
of
the
usual
roles
of
a
traditional
self-‐advocacy
group,
Halton
Speak
Out
also
runs
an
established
performing
arts
group
called
Ella
Together.
Ella
Together
has
a
clear
agenda
-‐
via
public
performances
-‐
in
using
the
arts
to
challenge
perceptions
of
its
largely
disabled
cohort.
This
resonated
strongly
with
my
research
interests
and
the
organisation
remains
keen
to
develop
this
strand
of
their
practice.
However,
as
the
focus
of
the
project
was
curation,
I
was
also
keen
to
collaborate
with
a
second
organisation
to
draw
in
additional
expertise
in
Inclusive
Arts
and
curatorial
practice,
ensuring
the
broadest
reach
and
impact
for
the
exhibition
and
research.
The
second
partner
I
approached
was
Bluecoat,
an
iconic
arts
space
in
Liverpool.
Bluecoat
was
approached
not
just
because
of
its
well-‐
regarded
art
gallery
and
engagement
programme
but
primarily
because
of
Blue
Room,
an
award
winning
inclusive
arts
project
for
learning
disabled
people.
Whilst
the
Blue
Room
members
create
a
breadth
of
art
work,
they
had
yet
to
engage
with
curatorial
practices
which
presented
a
key
area
for
the
groups
development.
Helen
Graham,
Associate
Professor
in
the
School
of
Fine
Art,
History
of
Art
and
Cultural
Studies
at
9
the
University
of
Leeds
took
the
lead
in
supervising
along
with
Fine
Art
Lecturer
Emma
Rushton,
and
drawing
upon
these
partners’
expertise
resulted
in
a
successful
bid
in
March
2014.
Summary
Over
the
past
40
years
within
the
UK
the
concept
of
self-‐advocacy
has
gained
momentum
by
enabling
learning
disabled
people
to
speak
out
in
order
to
affect
change.
In
the
same
period,
inclusive
approaches
have
been
taken
up
both
in
research
(Walmsley
and
Johnson,
2003)
and
in
the
arts,
reflecting
a
growing
recognition
of
learning
disabled
people
as
researchers,
artists,
performers
and
communicators.
Whilst
this
has
resulted
in
a
proliferation
of
work
by
learning
disabled
people
in
the
performing
and
visual
arts
(Fox
and
Macpherson,
2015),
curation
has
only
rarely
been
explored
and
then
principally
in
museums
dealing
with
history
(Open
University,
2008;
Museum
of
Liverpool,
2014;
Access
All
Areas,
2017)
rather
than
in
the
context
of
art
galleries.
This
gap
in
the
practice
led
me
to
develop
this
research;
Art
as
Advocacy.
Via
a
practice-‐led
approach,
this
research
explores
the
potential
for
curatorship
by
learning
disabled
artists
to
act
as
a
site
for
self-‐advocacy,
examining
whether
curating
can
be
an
effective
way
for
this
group
to
communicate
collective
political
concerns
out
into
the
public
realm.
Importantly,
Art
as
Advocacy
is
underpinned
by
collaborating
with
two
organisations:
Halton
Speak
Out
and
Bluecoat.
From
these
organisation’s
memberships
I
recruited
five
learning
disabled
people
who
had
all
applied
to
take
on
the
role
of
a
curator;
Hannah
Bellass
and
Leah
Jones
from
Halton
Speak
Out,
and
Tony
Carroll,
Diana
Disley
and
Eddie
Rauer
from
Bluecoat’s
Blue
Room.
By
strategically
recruiting
the
curators
from
both
of
these
organisations,
I
was
able
to
bring
together
knowledge
and
skills
in
self-‐advocacy
into
dialogue
with
knowledge
and
skills
in
artistic
expression.
Once
the
research
team
was
in
place,
myself
plus
two
support
workers
met
the
curators
weekly
at
Bluecoat
over
the
course
of
a
year
in
order
to
curate
an
exhibition.
The
result
was
Auto
Agents,
a
visual
arts
exhibition
which
opened
at
Bluecoat
on
26th
November
2016
to
15th
January
2017,
and
then
went
on
to
be
displayed
at
The
Brindley
in
Halton
between
4th
March
and
15th
April
2017.
Significantly,
both
the
participatory
process
of
curating
and
the
exhibition
theme
itself
came
together
to
address
an
issue
that
is
at
the
heart
of
advancing
the
rights
of
learning
disabled
people;
autonomy.
Autonomy,
or
in
the
words
of
the
curators
“what
it
means
10
Description:cited thesis that “curating should be understood as fine art” (2014, p. 83). While Spaid agrees that curatorial ideas offer (though only temporarily) a genuine contribution to the life of the artworks involved, she identifies a crucial distinction in that she considers curatorial ideas to “co