DEXHSLOHfTOT AND IWAHJATION OF THE BALTIMORE TEACHERS* IN-SERVICE COmJHITr 3TUDT PROGRAH By Harry Bard Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Maryland In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Education 1951 UMI Number: DP70265 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UM I Dissertation Publishing UMI DP70265 Published by ProQuest LLC (2015). Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code Pr v ro/Q—v uest ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 fhm m$hm iriiho* to osrparooo hi* £00$ opprooi&iloii to th* m i h fftH il fortiolpoot# 1* tho ia m ii^ Staily $*oft*o»» lo tho &jron|£ £o«toro» to tho o**p oofisomôitwo of « m a i^ oijoooio*, t* it*# otaff of tho Mm&toa Bopootftoot *t tho &BdTef»ftitp of IlMfiaaO,- ooA to tho wmmtmm ooo«ott«»to* ifooioi thaiOr* *ro oirtoadod t* fooooih Borroth* &««£«tooi ôosNtis-i&tor of tho 0##E@8BBdtiy otooy pdpoorojo*, to s>f* 3m $**«? fagio# aa£ #i# ooHvo Bsatimor# hoard of spp#rlnt#n£oiit*, to hr*. fhartii* B« notion, to«rot«rtL*& Mio to tho i*9|f«sf to Br« a. w iîn ■who m s T^rtiooiofly h^tpfhl oith Chaptor Two, «oft to Hr* A&otii oth&sigtor of tho MtaNNAtp of hotjfSoaO oho** ohto #r*i£*»oo* l~Ooa»smi ty Bolatlea* 1m Hit MLt&flNm So&ool . . .............. ♦ The CotwfcttsiSjr ita ^ r lo-S orvico F ro g ***,.............................. 0* Wmlmtloa of ilio FrOfrawo * jUa&Xyoi* osai fttkoryvote&loa of B&ta..... ... ........... . . . . . . . . . .......... 1# looosaisoBdot A ©»« for ls*pswo**aS m i lOf&lo&Hoao for $wr ■.jp|prv» ^ iW'*wa*irwWw?'vlKW "•HP1 »» “ ■ or zp'wm » g 0»am ¥i W . ««**#******#*********. . *• ■« Tftss mmm*m aw m iv rm x a m o * Tho otgotflooaoo of relating tin# echo el to the oesimmliy g*e#» hadte to fho Iwâningss of AnMriooh odito&iiim in tho oowftatoonth during tho early yearn of tho public school# laymen purdsaiMsd tho school, buildinge* hired tho teacher#, determined tho eurri etilu® and often A..CMMHHt,*>: .«*». «nart hottd Var 1 aoceiemtei this cowietioai it m i them that ytikdosto bought oaring* etampa, woftrod ia war vegetable gardeae* ooltoetod *©*£$ mM carried out numerous* oetiwitloo hrlooiof them lot# tho oowaoity. Moreover,. oohool building# wor# often uo#4 during 1917-1S har draft b*aft£*t by military grrnspm and by patriotic agencies. Many of thooo effective relatlonshipe between school and community wore eeatinaed on through tho f 19201 # whoa pMmnt^toathor ovft#&l«&tlOB« mad eivie aômol## war# imernss- lag la number and amdt i#v#lops#ai#. However, It voo really th# 1930* • and. 4of a that brought profound writing# «ad otgalf toast #rp#rl®#atailom In th# field* fhm phllooophy of tho commnity*school ld#» » « eiajpifled by Hdwarft ami tichoy who hold that, “Fbo dynamic# of ©due ilcmal change I* to bo found sot primarily In the voile ami influence of odneatlonol philosophers ami reformer#, hut is th# ooo&ol force# #$#y#Mag In th# to duty.** fh#«# author# did much to adtas&o* tho idea that th# school ami th# ©owsasmity could mot «Kl«t apart fron #ssd* #1&#f m m if pmptm tri^tod tbi# to occur* Oaokr #M 0*«te noted, th# lôrtoaco of that® relationship* la their philosophical treatment «tat«dp * School problem# of grcait^ importance to the nation,**

m$ wr *% » 4 S a I I Ma* 2< $ »rn M* W ms* i * W ! * I & « o» # «* •* a « tar 0 « f I i i % » wS * I » a f W m a i § % T | f % *% ** n * ** * # A I s #l ni # * *«1* 593 Jn| saa tf* $** g. * S8 a *• $ »■* *% ( t * I p i o* % O »l V* » IS «( * r«► % a * ■* 0 & i % & * « « * * *¥ ** %

Development and evaluation of the Baltimore teachers’ in-service community study program

Similar Development and evaluation of the Baltimore teachers’ in-service community study program